Judgments - Accident Claims
EUNUS ALI VS THE BRANCH MANAGER (LEGAL) BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD & 2 ORS
Ram Lal Vs. Dr. Kaushar @ Saraf Imtiyaz & Anr.
SHRI SURESH SAKHARAM KADAM... Vs THE TRANSPORT MANAGER,THANE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING
SMT. SEEMA SUDAM AUTI AND ORS. Vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY
SMT. SEEMA SUDAM AUTI AND ORS. Vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY Full Judgment
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Vs SEEMA SUDAM AUTI AND ORS
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Vs. HINDUSTAN SAFETY GLASS WORKS LTD
When a claim is made by the insured that itself is actionable. There is no question of requiring the insured to approach a court of law for adjudication of the claim. This would amount to the encouraging avoidable litigation which certainly cannot be the intention of the insurance policies and is in any case not in public interest. In our opinion, in a dispute concerning a consumer, it is necessary for the courts to take a Full Judgment
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY VS SMT. DHANALATA MECH & 10 ORS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Upendra Kumar And 3 Others
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Upendra Kumar And 3 Others
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD Vs SUMAN JEE JHA & ORS
GOLLA RAJANNA ETC. ETC. Vs. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND ANR ETC ETC.
The Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, having regard to the evidence, had returned a finding on the nature of injury and the percentage of disability. It is purely a question of fact. There is no case for the insurance company that the finding is based on no evidence at all or that it is perverse. Under Section 4(1)(c)(ii) of the Act, Full Judgment
SANDHYA RANI DEBBARMA & ORS Vs. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD & ANR
U P S R T C Vs. MAMTA AND ORS
MALATI SARDAR Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
The question for consideration thus is whether the Tribunal at Kolkata had the jurisdiction to decide the claim application under Section 166 of the Act when the accident took place outside Kolkata jurisdiction and the claimant also resided outside Kolkata jurisdiction, but the respondent being a juristic person carried on business at Kolkata. Further question is whether in absence of Full Judgment
MITHUSINH PANNASINH CHAUHAN Vs. GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. & ANR
ASHA VERMAN & ORS. Vs. MAHARAJ SINGH & ORS.
On applying the principles as laid down in the case of Sarla Verma (supra), 50% of the salary must be added to the income of the deceased towards future prospects of income, which comes to Rs.6,900/- per month, i.e. Rs.82,800/- per annum. Deducting 1/4th for personal expenses and applying the appropriate multiplier taking into consideration the age of Full Judgment
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. RAM PAL
Only question raised for consideration is whether the sentence imposed in the facts and circumstances is fair and just. Moreover, in an appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution, this Court does not re-appreciate the evidence, in absence of perversity or patent legal error, merely because a different view was also possible. We are thus, not inclined to reopen Full Judgment
JAKIR HUSSEIN Vs. SABIR & ORS
With regard to the pain, suffering and trauma which have been caused to the appellant due to his crushed hand, it is contended that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was meagre and insufficient. It is not in dispute that the appellant had remained in the hospital for a period of over three months. It is not possible for the courts to make a precise assessment of the pain and trauma suffered Full Judgment