Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
APPLICATION U/s 482, 4331
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
APPLICATION U/s 482, 6623
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4436
of 2010, Judgment Date: Apr 30, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
CRIMINAL MISC. CASE, 1400
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 30, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 246
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015
“When a question of law is raised for the first time in a court of last
resort, upon the construction of a document, or upon facts either admitted
or proved beyond controversy, it is not only competent but expedient, in
the interests of justice, to entertain the plea.”
Therefore, with regard
to the above mentioned aspect regarding the plea of the competency of the
Deputy Labour Commissioner to pass an Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2734
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015
Mr. Patwalia has rightly placed reliance to
support the aforesaid submissions, on a judgment of this Court in the case
of Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy (2010) 8 SCC 383.
The law relating to
effect of fraud upon a competent authority to get an appointment/office as
well as effect of fraud upon court has been discussed in detail in
paragraphs 28 to 36 Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6561
of 2004, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4542
of 2007, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015
The question raised before us is whether the respondent-Revenue could
resile from a settlement entered into with the assessee on the basis of
which the appellant has already paid and settled his dues under the Act.
“In a Taxing Act one has to look merely at what is clearly said. There is
no room for any intendment. There is no equity about a tax. There Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4043
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
it is
the prerogative of the Creditor alone whether he would move against the
principal debtor first or the surety, to realize the loan amount.
“Therefore, the creditor has a right to obtain a decree against the surety
and the principal debtor. The surety has no right to restrain execution of
the decree against him until the creditor has exhausted his remedy against
the principal debtor Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 728
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 728
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2180
of 2009, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 181
of 2013, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2174
of 2009, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1647-1648
of 2008, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 709
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 707
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 707
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
707
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
CONC->CONTEMPT CASE, 548 of 2013
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
