Judgments
STATE OF A.P. Vs. P.VENKATESHWARLU
The demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification is a sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution is duty bound to establish that there was illegal offer of bribe and acceptance thereof and it has to be founded on facts. The offence under Section 7 of P.C. Act has been confirmed by the Full Judgment
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. KESAVAPATNAM CHINA SWAMY
KIRSHNA TEXPORT & CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. Vs. ILA A AGRAWAL & ORS.
K.S. RAVINDRAN Vs. BRANCH MANAGR,NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Vs. CALCUTTA MINERAL SUPPLY CO.P.LTD. & ORS.
ZONAL.GEN.MANAGER,IRCON INTER.NATNL.LTD. Vs. M/S VINAY HEAVY EQUIPMENTS
M/S. B.P.L. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUT
NON-REPORTABLE Full Judgment
M/S. COAL HANDLERS PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA
M/S. SECURE METERS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI
K.RADHIKA Vs. T.RAJYA LAXMI & ORS.
It consists of innumerable errors. We only hope that it is not the desire of the High Court that such candidates are required to be appointed merely because they have the higher grade qualification. We, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the judgment under appeal. Full Judgment
Shri Ram Naresh Yadav Versus State of M.P. and others
Smt. Premwati Devi Vs. State Of U.P. & Another
Having considered the aforesaid submissions, this court finds that the application to withdraw the suit in appeal has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, which was rightly held to be not maintainable as there was no compromise between the parties. Even otherwise, the suit has been dismissed on merits and also applications for amendment have been rejected. Full Judgment
Ajit Kumar Shanti Prakash Vs. Rajendra Bahadur & 10 Others
RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD Vs. NEW PINK CITY NIRMAN SAHKA.SAM.LD.& ANR.
Constructive notice in legal fiction signifies that the individual person should know as a reasonable person would have. Even if they have no actual knowledge of it. Constructive notice means a man ought to have known a fact. A person is said to have notice of a fact when he actually knows a fact but for Full Judgment
JAGDISH CHAND SHARMA Vs. NARAIN SINGH SAINI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS
14. As would be evident from the contents of Section 63 of the Act that to execute the Will as contemplated therein, the testator would have to sign or affix his mark to it or the same has to be signed by some other person in his presence and on his direction. Further the signature or mark of the testator or the signature of the person signing for him has to be so Full Judgment