Judgments
Ramchander Vs. Ananta
OM AGGARWAL Vs. HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION & ORS.
law laid down by the Hon'ble 5 Judges of the Apex Court of India reported in AIR 1969 SC 78 that in case the Statutory Authorities do not act in Full Judgment
Indra Bahadur Srivastava Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Senior Post Master Head Post Office And Anr. Vs Baboo Lal Sahu And 3 Ors.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Another Vs Smt. Rajesh Sharma & 2 Others
Smt. Kanta Pandey Vs Union Of India Thru' Its Secy. & 4 Others
PRASAR BHARTI Vs. BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ORS.
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA & ORS.
The question to be considered is whether the High Court is justified in awarding compensation of Rs.55,00,000/- without any discussion and computation. The approach of the High Court cannot be said to be justified in such cases of injury. It is necessary to make computation of compensation to be awarded on account of pecuniary Full Judgment
RAVI PRAKASH SINGH @ ARVIND SINGH Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
In State of M.P. v. Rustam and others[5], this Court has laid down the law that while computing period of ninety days, the day on which the accused was remanded to the judicial custody should be excluded, and the day on which challan is filed in the court, should be included. That being Full Judgment
THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & OTHERS Vs. REVAT SINGH
Fixing eligibility for a particular post or even for admission to a course falls within the exclusive domain of the legislature/executive and cannot be the subject-matter of judicial review, unless found to Full Judgment
M/S BHANDARI UDYOG LTD Vs. INDUSTRIAL FACILITATION COUNCIL & ANR
The short question that falls for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the Bombay High Court has correctly decided the jurisdiction of a Court to entertain application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996? Indisputably, the Arbitration proceeding has been conducted within the jurisdiction of Raichur court, which has jurisdiction as per Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure and is Full Judgment
M/S SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED AND ANR. Vs. T. THANKAM
Once an application is duly filed in terms of Section 8 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Arbitration Act') before the civil court, what should be the approach of the court, is the short question arising for consideration in this case. Once there is an agreement between the parties to refer the disputes or differences arising out of the agreement to arbitration, and in case Full Judgment
SUNIL HARIBHAU KALE Vs. AVINASH GULABRAO MARDIKAR AND ORS
In a democracy, a leader is not imposed; leader is elected. Once the birth of a leader in a group is by way of election by the group, the group leader thus elected cannot be replaced otherwise than through the very same process of the election in the group, in the absence of any rules to the contra. No doubt, the Nationalist Congress Party has 17 members Full Judgment
Rajesh Kumar Kaushik Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh (now the State of Chhattisgarh)
SANJEEV Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
It is settled principle of law that, to establish commission of murder by an accused, motive is not required to be proved. Motive is something which prompts a man to form an intention. The intention can be formed even at the place of incident at the time of commission of Full Judgment