Filter by Date
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Mahesh Thakur And 4 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 13953 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 21, 2015

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Kaptan Singh And 5 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 13977 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 21, 2015

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Anar Singh And Another Vs. State Of U.P.

APPLICATION U/s 482, 12717 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 20, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. And Anr. Vs. Nitin Kumar And 9 Others

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 310 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 19, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.L BAKOLIA Vs. STATE TH. DIRECTOR,C.B.I.

AA, 797 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

For coming to the finding of guilt for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, firstly, there must be a demand and secondly, there must be acceptance in the sense that the accused received illegal gratification. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PREM RAM Vs. M.D. UTTARAKHAND PEY JAL & NIRM.NIGM&ORS

Appeal (Civil), 4474 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

If engagement in a work- charged establishment rest on a criterion, no better than the absolute discretion of the authority engaging them or the fortuitous circumstances of a vacancy or need in a work-charged establishment, then, there is indeed no difference between a daily-wager on the one hand and work-charged employees on the other. No distinction can resultantly be Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CANARA BANK & ANR. Vs. M. MAHESH KUMAR

Appeal (Civil), 260 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Common question of law falling for consideration in these civil appeals is whether the dependant family members of the deceased employee of the appellant-Canara Bank were entitled to seek compassionate appointment on the basis of ‘Dying in Harness Scheme’ which was passed Vide Circular No.154/1993 w.e.f. 8.05.1993. (i) Compassionate employment cannot be made in the absence of rules or regulations issued by the Government or a public authority. The request Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RANJEET KUMAR RAM @ RANJEET KUMAR DAS Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Appeal (Crl.), 1831 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAMANLAL & ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 2279 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S GMG ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES & ORS. Vs. M/S ISAA GREEN POWER SOLUTION & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4472 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

MANYATA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U.P & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 4475 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

District Magistrate should have simply certified her character because that was the only question which the former was called upon to examine while dealing with the request made by the appellant. The District Magistrate, however, appears to have been swayed by considerations wholly extraneous to the question whether the appellant had a good moral character. it is Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

C.I.T MUMBAI Vs. M/S SARKAR BUILDERS

Appeal (Civil), 4476 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BILASPUR RAIPUR K.GRAMIN BANK AND ANR. Vs. MADANLAL TANDON

Appeal (Civil), 4467 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

MUNNA LAL JAIN & ANR. Vs. VIPIN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4497 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

ABDUL RAZAK & ORS Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY SHO,HUTTI PS

0000 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SESHASAYEE PAPER & BOARD LTD. Vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal (Civil), 1812-1813 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Urvashi Bai Sharma & Another Vs Smt. Indumati Sharma & Others.

WA->WRIT APPEAL, 42 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Dilip Kumar Diwan Vs State of chhattisgarh

MCRC->MISC. CRIMINAL CASE, 1782 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

COMMON CAUSE & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 13/2014 and 387/2015 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)

MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATION Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Writ Petition (Civil), 1072 of 2013, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Full Judgment