Filter by Date
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Bhuneshwar Prasad Yadav Vs Badridhar Diwan

EP->ELECTION PETITION, 07 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Election
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Shri Prakash Tiwari Vs. State Of U.P.

BAIL, 3688 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Dr. Hitendra Kumar Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh & others

WA->WRIT APPEAL, 309 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

The short question that arises for consideration as to whether Vacation Judge sitting alone while acting in the long vacation as a Vacation Judge can exercise the appellate jurisdiction expressly conferred by Act of 2006 to  a Division Bench comprising of two judges of the High Court by virtue of Rule 41 of the Rules of 2007? . Vacation Judge sitting alone has no jurisdiction to hear writ appeals. Matter referred to Hon’ble Chief Justice for consideration. Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Rajendra Prasad Misra Vs. The State Of U.P

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 4568 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Om Prakash Vs. The State Of U.P

BAIL, 4569 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Molahey Ram Gautam Vs. The State Of U.P

BAIL, 4572 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Chhotu Vs. The State Of U.P

BAIL, 4574 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Pappu Singh @ Babulal Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 16210 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 05, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Pappu Vs. State Of U.P.

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION, 19189 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

INDRA DALAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 1261 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the courts have resorted to the dictionary meaning and explained that incriminating statements by the accused to the police suggesting the inference of the commission of the crime would amount to confession and, therefore, inadmissible under this provision. It is also defined to mean Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PREM SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 569 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

Insofar as circumstances leading to connecting the appellant with the said murder are concerned, following evidence has come on record: (i) Brother of the deceased i.e. PW-9 had seen the appellant working in the fields which are adjacent to the fields of victim's family where Sunita had gone to collect Barseem. (ii) The appellant was keeping an evil eye on the deceased. (iii) The sickle, weapon used in the murder, Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BIJENDRA BHAGAT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Appeal (Crl.), 2202 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

According to the witnesses these two accused were also armed with country made pistols. The injuries suffered by the deceased are incised wounds and one fire arm injury. However, none of the injuries on the person of the deceased could be attributed to the lathi which was supposedly in the hands of the appellant. Undoubtedly, three injuries on the person Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Rakesh Kumar And Others Vs. Ashok Kumar And Anr.

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227, 1648 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Nandani Ramchandani And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Ors.

APPLICATION U/s 482, 1568 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

Section 3 of PML Act clearly speaks that whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of the crime and projecting it as untainted property shall be guilty of the offences of money laundering. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the person who acquired the proceeds of crime is being helped by anybody directly or indirectly knowingly to convert that Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State Of U.P. And Another Vs. Anil Kumar Bharti

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 302 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 28, 2015

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Chief Justice's Court AFR Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 302 of 2015 Appellant :- State Of U.P. And Another Respondent :- Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHABNAM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Writ Petition (Crl.), 88 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 27, 2015

The present writ petitions are filed on the allegations that on 21.05.2015, death warrants have been issued by the learned Sessions Judge, which are impermissible inasmuch as various remedies which are available to the convicts, even after the dismissal of the appeals by this Court, are still open and yet to be exercised by them. It is submitted that these convicts can file review petition seeking review of Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sandeep and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Appeal (Crl.), 1554 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 26, 2015

The incompatibility or inconsistency can be said to arise if the assertions in one dying declaration are so diametrically opposed to the statements in the other that both cannot stand together. 21. In view of the above, the law on the issue of dying declaration can be summarised to the effect that in case the court comes to the conclusion that the dying declaration is true and reliable, has been recorded Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Guriya Swayam Sevi Sansthan Thru' Its President Vs. Union Of India Thru' Principal Secy. & 5 Others

WRIT - A, 4579 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 26, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Mohd. Naseem And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Anr.

CRIMINAL MISC. CASE, 1654 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 26, 2015

It is not res integra that learned Magistrate while accepting the final report can treat the protest petition as complaint. It is not in dispute that by accepting the final report, the order of taking cognizance has been passed. The provisions of Section 300, Cr.P.C. could not be attracted. It is well settled principle of law that after accepting the final report, the Magistrate can proceed on the basis of complaint or on the basis of protest petition treating it Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Prem Prakash And 3 Others Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others

307 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 25, 2015

Full Judgment