Judgments
DEEPA @ DEEP CHAND & ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
ANIRUDH KUMAR Vs. MUNICIPAL CORP. OF DELHI & ORS.
Be as that may, this nature of ligation cannot be allowed to be settled between the parties as it involves public interest and violation of rule of law. The running of the Pathological Lab in the building by the respondent-owners amount to violation of the rule of law and affects the public interest, therefore, it is public interest litigation even though the appellant herein Full Judgment
AVAS AYUKT,U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKAS PAR.& ORS Vs. BHAGWAN TIWARI & ANR.
TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
the question that arises for consideration is whether liberty on the one hand and fair and effective investigation on the other, make out a case for extending the benefit under Section 438 CrPC. Needless to say "Liberty is to the collective body, what health is to every individual body. Without health, no pleasure can be tasted by man; without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society. Having stated about the Full Judgment
SANJIV KUMAR @ GORA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
We have considered the rival submissions of the parties, and we are of the view that sentencing for any offence has a social goal. In each case, facts and circumstances of that case are always required to be taken into consideration. For the purpose of just and proper Full Judgment
HMT WATCHES LTD. Vs. M.A. ABIDA & ANR
Whether the cheques were given as security or not, or whether there was outstanding liability or not is a question of fact which could have been determined only by the trial court after recording evidence of the parties. In our opinion, the High Court should not have Full Judgment
PRIYANKA SRIVASTAVA & ANR Vs. STATE OF U.P.& ORS.
VIPULBHAI M. CHAUDHARY Vs. GUJARAT COOP. MILK MARKT. FED. LTD & ORS
DHROPADABAI & ORS. Vs. M/S. TECHNOCRAFT TOOLINGS
Smt. Shanti Bai Agrawal & Others Vs Smt. Uma Bai Agarwal & Others
Shokeen Vs State Of U.P.
T.NADU TERMD.FULL TIME TEM.LIC EMP.ASSN. Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP.OF INDIA & ORS.
The concerned workmen are the members of the appellant-Associations, Federation of Employees Association, Workers Association and other concerned individual workmen who were working in the branches of the Corporation at various places in the country have raised the existing industrial dispute between the concerned workmen and the management of Full Judgment
RAM SINGH & ORS Vs. UOI
The challenge in the present group of writ petitions is to a Notification published in the Gazette of India dated 04.03.2014 by which the Jat Community has been included in the Central List of Backward Classes for the States of Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, NCT of Delhi, Bharatpur and Dholpur districts of Rajasthan, Full Judgment
STATE OF MP. & ORS. Vs. MALA BANERJEE
3 Very briefly stated, the dispute pertains to the eligibility of the Respondents, all of whom are Lecturers/Teachers in the employment of the Education and Tribal Welfare Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, for increased pay scales. The Respondents claim the benefits of the Kramonnati Scheme with effect from 19.4.1999, whereas the Appellants assert that they are willing to grant the benefit of the Kramonnati Scheme Full Judgment
DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. Vs. INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORP.& ORS
The issue falling for consideration is whether minutes of meeting can override statutory regulations. Article 77 of the Constitution of India deals with the conduct of business of Government of India while Article 166 of the Constitution of India deals with the conduct of business of the Government of Full Judgment
JYOTI LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. BHARAT J. PATEL & OTHERS
The maintainability of a suit is question of law. Though, by virtue of declaration under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, all suits of civil nature are maintainable unless barred either by an express provision or by implication of law. We are of the opinion that the directions in paras 7.2 and 7.3 are inconsistent with the directions in para 7.4. Apart from Full Judgment
TATA STEEL LTD Vs. UOI & ORS
The appeals are disposed of as above. The question for our consideration in the set of appeals filed by Tata Steel is whether royalty is chargeable under Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Second Schedule thereto on raw or unprocessed or Run-of-Mine (ROM) coal at the pit-head or is it chargeable on coal after it is processed and Full Judgment
M. MAHENDAR KUMAR Vs. M. MANI AND ORS
It was clearly on account of non application of mind to such relevant fact that the impugned order came to be passed at the initial stage of admission without noticing any counter affidavit or reply and/or its absence. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are constrained to and hereby set aside the impugned order as it has Full Judgment