Judgments
EDARA HARIBABU Vs. TULLURI VENKATA NARASIMHAM AND ORS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I Vs CHETAN GUPTA
DHARAMBIR SINGH Vs M/S HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. AND ORS
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI
Ram Khelawan @ Chhotu & 8 Ors. Vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Nitesh Kumar Mishra Vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. & Ors.
Smt. Manju Devi And 2 Others Vs Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Judge Muzaffar Nagar
Ajeet Yadav And 6 Others Vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others
BHANUBEN AND ANR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
Merely because an accused has been held liable to be punished under Section 498A IPC, it does not follow that on the same evidence, he must also and necessarily be held guilty of having abetted the commission of suicide by the women concerned under 306 IPC. Therefore, the conviction and sentence for offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 114 of the Full Judgment
M/S PERIYAR & PAREEKANNI RUBBERS LTD. Vs. STATE OF KERALA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SRI VIJAY SINGH KADAN
GAGAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY Vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR
RAM KUMAR & ORS Vs THE ADMINISTRATOR OF UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI
Prabhu Nath Mishra Vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Prabhu Nath Mishra Vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
P. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Vs THE DIST. INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR.
In a recent enunciation by this Court to discern the imperative pre-requisites of Sections 7 and 13 of the Act, it has been underlined in B. Jayaraj (supra) in unequivocal terms, that mere possession and recovery of currency notes from an accused without proof of demand would not establish an offence under Sections 7 as well as 13(1)(d)(i)&(ii) of the Act. It has been propounded Full Judgment