Judgments
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR Vs. R.K. ZALPURI AND ORS
AVENUE SUPERMARTS PVT. LTD. Vs. NISCHINT BHALLA & ORS.
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TPT CORPN. Vs. ALEXIX SONIER & ANR.
NARAYAN LAXMAN PATIL Vs. M/S GALA CONSTRUCTION CO.P.LTD.& ORS.
RAM BAHAL & ANR. Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION & ORS.
YELLAPU UMA MAHESWARI & ANR Vs. BUDDHA JAGADHEESWARARAO & ORS
MOOL RAJ TYAGI & OTHERS Vs GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION & ANR. Vs GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) Vs ALL INDIA PERSONALITY ENHANCEMENT & CULTURAL CENTRE FOR SCHOLARS AIPECCS SOCIETY
SUSHILA & ORS Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. F.NATARAJ
In the present case, the gaps in the evidences of the prosecutrix and the medical officer make it highly improbable that sexual intercourse took place. It would be erroneous to rely upon such discrepant testimonies and convict the accused. It can thus be stated with certitude that the solitary evidence of the prosecutrix, in absence of any corroboration by the medical evidence, is not of such quality which can be Full Judgment
D.THAMODARAN Vs. KANDASAMY & ANR
DAYA SAH & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA DATT PANDE & ORS.
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS
Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant- Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment