Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 4387
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 19, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 4069
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 19, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 4406
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 19, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CM(M), 674
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 19, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1945
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 19, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 3995
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 19, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
MISC. COMPANY APPLICATION, 4410
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT - A, 6820
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT - C, 36599,38407
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT - C, 45585
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 5589
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT - C, 42123,42202
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SECOND APPEAL, 512
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Special Leave Petition (Civil), 13915
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
It is a settled principle of law that only those issues could be
given up by the party which are the subject matter of the lis before the
Court. Since in the petition before this Court, the issue with regard to
award of mesne profits at the rate of 30/- p.m. was not the subject matter
at the instance of any party to the lis, the question of Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 32135
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
The first and foremost is an unequivocal
declaration that mere award of four red ink entries to an individual does
not make his discharge mandatory. This implies that four red ink entries is
not some kind of laxman rekha, which if crossed would by itself render the
individual concerned undesirable or unworthy of retention in the force.
Award of four red ink entries simply pushes the individual concerned into a
grey area where Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Contempt Petition (Civil), 339
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
The question that fell for consideration
therein was whether the practice adopted by the Government of Pondicherry
of counting the service of Section Officers/Junior Engineers who have
qualified as graduates while in service only from the date they passed the
degree or equivalent examination for purposes of promotion to the post of
Assistant Engineers under Rule 11(1) of the Government of Pondicherry
Assistant Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
LPA, 727,728,729,730
of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
LPA, 565
of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
LPA, 983
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT - C, 41148,41151
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
