Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.S. SOUNDARARAJAN AND ORS. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF H.R. & C.E. AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2401 of 2003, Judgment Date: Nov 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Appeal (Civil), 2806 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHAMSHER SINGH VERMA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 1525 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 24, 2015

Special Judge, Kaithal, in Sessions Case No. 33 of 2014, and rejected the application of the accused for getting exhibited the compact disc, filed in defence and to get the same proved from Forensic Science Laboratory. The only point of relevance at present is whether the accused has been denied right of defence or not. In Ziyauddin Barhanuddin Bukhari vs. Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra and Full Judgment

Tags Evidence
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. ICAP INDIA PVT. LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 5275 of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BRIJ BIHARI SINGH Vs. BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION & ORS.(R-1,4,7)

Appeal (Civil), 1217 of 2011, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2015

It is well settled that a person who is required to answer a charge imposed should know not only the accusation but also the testimony by which the accusation is supported. The delinquent must be given fair chance to hear the evidence in support of the charge and to cross-examine the witnesses who prove the charge. The delinquent must also be given a chance to Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAJ SINGH @ RAJA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA TR.SEC.MINISTY OF HOME

Appeal (Crl.), 1475 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ELEKTRON LIGHTING SYSTEMS PVT LTD AND ANR Vs. SHAH INVESTMENTS FINANCIALS DEVELOPMENTS AND CONSULTANTS PVT LTD AND ORS ETC.

Appeal (Civil), 9151-9152 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. RAMESH

Appeal (Crl.), 1526 of 2008, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KRISHNA BHATACHARJEE Vs. SARATHI CHOUDHURY AND ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 1545 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. STATE BANK OF PATIALA TR.GEN.MANAGER Vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA

Appeal (Civil), 5212-5220 of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 18, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PROF. N.K.GANGULY Vs. CBI NEW DELHI

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 798 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 18, 2015

“....Whether sanction is to be accorded or not, is a matter for the Government to consider. The absolute power to accord or withhold sanction on the Government is irrelevant and foreign to the duty cast on that Court which is the ascertainment of the true nature of the act.” “It is clear that the first part of Section 197(1) provides a special protection, inter Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

B. RADHAKRISHNAN Vs. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 13407 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 17, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAM LAKHAN SINGH Vs. STATE GOVT. OF U P

Writ Petition (Civil), 933 of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 17, 2015

A public servant in a democracy should be a guardian of morals. He is entrusted with higher responsibilities of a public office and they contribute their best for the just and humane society. We feel that for effective functioning of a democracy, the role of Executive is very important. Civil servants and public officials are expected Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA Vs. GENERAL MANAGER-II AND APPOINTING AUTHORITY AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 13448 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 17, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VISHWANATH DADU GURAV (D) TH. LRS & ORS Vs. DATTATRAY GANAPATI GURAV

Appeal (Civil), 9190-9191 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PARVAIZ AHMAD PARRY Vs. STATE OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 13368 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015

In our view, if a candidate has done B.Sc. in Forestry as one of the major subjects and has also done Masters in the Forestry, i.e., M.Sc.(Forestry) then in the absence of any clarification on such issue, the candidate possessing such higher qualification has to be held to possess the required qualification to apply for the post. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD Vs. M/S APEEJAY SHIPPING LTD

Appeal (Civil), 9187 of 2015, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015

Misconduct, as has been laid down, does not always have a moral connotation. To elaborate, it may not have any connection with the individual/personal conduct of the arbitrator. The said conduct would be in sphere of moral misconduct. As far as legal misconduct is concerned, as the authorities would demonstrate, the same must be manifest or palpable from the proceedings before the arbitrator. To Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

GURUDASSING NAWOOSINGH PANJWANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5102 of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JUPUDY PARDHA SARATHY Vs. PENTAPATI RAMA KRISHNA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 375 of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

ALL KERALA ONLINE LOTTERY DEALERS ASS. Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3518 of 2007, Judgment Date: Nov 05, 2015

Full Judgment