Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 14
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
it is clear that the High Court has recorded the concurrent findings on the
charges framed against the Appellant in the impugned judgment and order. It
has also failed to re-appreciate the evidence on record properly and
consider the law on the relevant aspect of the case. Therefore, the said
findings are not only erroneous in law but also suffer from error in law.
Hence, the same is Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 58
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 13
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4274
of 2014, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 9-10
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 244
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 9951
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 9951
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11039
of 2013, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
651
of 2013, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2508
of 2007, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 9951
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 10
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2016
The question for consideration thus is whether the Tribunal at
Kolkata had the jurisdiction to decide the claim application under Section
166 of the Act when the accident took place outside Kolkata jurisdiction
and the claimant also resided outside Kolkata jurisdiction, but the
respondent being a juristic person carried on business at Kolkata. Further
question is whether in absence of Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 12
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 231
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 258
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 123
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
1
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2016
Full Judgment