Latest Judgments of Supreme Court of India and M.P High Court.

It is a settled principle of law that curtailment of any right whether such a right emanates from common law, customary law or the Constitution can only be done by law made by an appropriate Legislative Body. Under the scheme of our Constitution, the appropriateness of the Legislative Body is determined on the basis of Full Judgment

Tags Interpretation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BIPINCHANDRA GAMANLAL CHOKSHI & ORS. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 14352 of 2015, Judgment Date: Dec 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PREMIUM GLOBAL SECURITIES PVT.LTD.& ORS Vs. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA&ANR

Appeal (Civil), 3682 of 2006, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Tax/ Tax Settlement, Excise Duty

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SRI CH.NARASIMHA RAO & ORS. Vs. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER ELURU & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 14248 of 2015, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Land And Disputes Land Acquisition

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Vs. A.P.INDUSTRIAL INFRACTRCTURE CORPN.& ORS

Appeal (Civil), 1041 of 2008, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Tax/ Tax Settlement, Excise Duty

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SODEXO SVC INDIA PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4385-4386 of 2015, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Tax/ Tax Settlement, Excise Duty

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. GUJARAT AMBUJA EXPORTS LTD & ANR. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 14184-14185 of 2015, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Tax/ Tax Settlement, Excise Duty

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SAT PRAKASH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 1163 of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Murder Rape

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHOBHA RAM RATURI Vs. HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD.& ORS

Appeal (Civil), 11325 of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2015

Having given our thoughtful consideration to the controversy, we are satisfied, that after the impugned order of retirement dated 31.12.2002 was set aside, the appellant was entitled to all consequential benefits. The fault lies with the respondents in not having utilised the services of the appellant for the period from 1.1.2003 to 31.12.2005. Had the appellant been allowed to continue in service, Full Judgment

Tags Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds Pay Removal From Service