Judgments
VEERENDRA KR.GAUTAM AND ORS Vs. KARUNA NIDHAN UPADHYAY AND ORS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. GAURAV VARSHNEY AND ANR.
MEERA MYDEEN ETC.ETC. Vs. STATE OF T.NADU
M/S Prakash Granite Industries versus The Punjab National Bank
KRYSTAL STONE EXPORTS LTD V/s STRESSED ASSET STABILIZATION FUND & ORS
MANOJ V/s UOI & ORS.
AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA V/s HOTEL LEELAVENTURE LTD.
RAJU CHAND Vs. THE ZONAL DIRECTOR NEHRU YUVA KENDRA SANGATHAN, CHANDIGARH & ORS.
JAWAHARLAL Vs. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR,H.C. OF KERALA&ORS.
NABAM REBIA AND ETC. ETC. Vs. DEPUTY SPEAKER AND ORS.- Power of Governor
137. As is evident from our constitutional history, there are three areas in which a Governor might function: Areas in which he can act only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. This is in all areas of the executive functions of the State Government [Article 166]. Areas in which he can act in his discretion by or under the Constitution and in which he Full Judgment
MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTA Vs. VIJAY CHHIBBER & ORS
AJAY KUMAR SINGH Vs. FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING & ORS.
M/S.NORTHERN COALFIELDS LTD. Vs. HEAVY ENGINEERING CORP.LTD. & ANR.
V. VASANTHAKUMAR Vs. H.C. BHATIA AND ORS
In view of cases pending in the Supreme Court of India on average for about 5 years, in the High Courts again for about 8 years, and anywhere between 5- 10 years in the Trial Courts on the average, would it not be part of the responsibility and duty of the Supreme Court of India to examine through a Constitution Bench, the issue of divesting the Supreme Court of about 80% of the pendency of Full Judgment