Judgments
M/S PARK STREET PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD Vs. DIPAK KUMAR SINGH AND ANR
ALLAHABAD DEVT.AUTH. Vs. M/S THE GENERAL FIBRE DEALERS & ANR
VIVEK SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P & ANR
The High Court reiterated the settled position of law that reservation for the physically handicapped category was to be provided as a matter of law and that such reservation was to be made on the basis of total sanctioned strength and not on the basis of available vacancy of a recruitment year. We are satisfied that the reservation which must be provided for, as a Full Judgment
BRAJENDRA SINGH YAMBEM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
JAMSHED ANSARI Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD & ORS.
SOUREN PAL AND ORS Vs. PRABHAT BOURI AND ORS
State of Haryana Vs Ram Mehar & Others Etc. Etc.
The decisions of this court when analysed appositely clearly convey that the concept of the fair trial is not in the realm of abstraction. It is not a vague idea. It is a concrete phenomenon. It is not rigid and there cannot be any strait- jacket formula for applying the same. On occasions it has the necessary flexibility. Full Judgment
DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD Vs. HAKUMAT RAI
KUMAR ALUMINIUM LTD Vs. ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA LTD AND ANR
M/S.I.P.& INVESTMENT CORPN.OF ORISSA LTD Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.AND ANR
VISHNU KUMAR SIKARAVAR Vs. ANIL KUMAR GARG AND ORS.
BRIJ LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Every accused is presumed to be innocent unless his guilt is proved. The presumption of innocence is a human right. Subject to the statutory exceptions, the said principle forms the basis of criminal jurisprudence in India. The nature of the offence, its seriousness and gravity has to be taken into consideration. The appellate court should bear in mind the presumption of innocence Full Judgment
VIMAL KISHOR SHAH & ORS. Vs. JAYESH DINESH SHAH & ORS.
The basic question, which arises for consideration in this appeal, is whether a clause in a Trust Deed, which provides for resolving the disputes arising between the beneficiaries of the Trust through arbitration, can constitute an “arbitration agreement” within the meaning of Section 2(b) and 2(h) read with Section 7 of the Act and whether the application filed Full Judgment
DAMAYANTI HEMANT MATANI Vs. DR. VIREN BHAGWANDAS ASHER AND ANR.
STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Vs. DR. DINESH SINGH CHAUHAN
30. As aforesaid, Regulations have been framed by an Expert Body based on past experience and including the necessity to reckon the services and experience gained by the in-service candidates in notified remote and difficult areas in the State. The proviso prescribes the measure for giving incentive marks to in-service candidates who have worked in notified remote and Full Judgment