Judgments
M/S. ANJANEY FERRO ALLOYS LTD. VERSUS JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS.
SWEETY GUPTA Vs NEETY GUPTA & ORS
SAROJ AGARWALLA(DEAD) THR LR ABHISHEK AGRAWALLA Vs. YASHEEL JAIN
RIHANA Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS.
CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INST.&ANR. Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT & ORS.
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET AASOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS
HET RAM BENIWAL & ORS. Vs. RAGHUVEER SINGH & ORS
It has been held by this Court that judges need not be protected and that they can take care of themselves. It is the right and interest of the public in the due administration of justice that have to be protected. See Asharam M. Jain v. A. T. Gupta, reported in (1983) 4 SCC 125. Vilification of judges would lead to the destruction of the system of administration of justice. The statements made by the Full Judgment
STATE OF J & K Vs. VICHAR KRANTI INTERNATIONAL & ANR
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M/S. CIPLA LTD. & ANR
LALA LAXMAN KIRDAT & ETC. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
LALA LAXMAN KIRDAT & ETC. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
YOGESH SINGH Vs. MAHABEER SINGH & ORS
HARBEER SINGH Vs. SHEESHPAL & ORS
KULDEEP SINGH Vs. RAJINDER KUMAR AND ORS
ARVIND KEJRIWAL Vs ARUN JAITLEY & ORS
VIVEK BATRA Vs. U.O.I & ORS
Having gone through the copy of note-sheets relating to sanction in question placed before us as part of rejoinder affidavit, it is evident that there had been proper application of mind on the part of the competent authority before the sanction was accorded. Our perusal of the said record does not indicate that any decision was taken by the competent authority, at any point of Full Judgment