Judgments
RAJA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
SYEDA RAHIMUNNISA Vs. MALAN BI (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.ETC.
JOSE @ PAPPACHAN Vs. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOYILANDY & ANR
In Dhan Raj @ Dhand vs. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 745, one of us (Hon. Ghose,J.) while dwelling on the imperatives of circumstantial evidence ruled that the same has to be of highest order to satisfy the test of proof in a criminal prosecution. It was underlined that such circumstantial evidence should establish a complete unbroken Full Judgment
RAJENDRA KUMAR MESHRAM Vs. VANSHMANI PRASAD VERMA AND ANR
HUBLI-DHARWAD URBAN DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. SHEKHAR GOWDA CHENNABSANNAGOWDA P.(D ) LR. & ANR.
WORKMEN RASTRIYA COLLIERY MAZDOOR SANGH Vs. BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. & ANR.
RE - INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS (II)
SADDIK @ LALO GULAM HUSSEIN SHAIKH & ORS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
VIKAS YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ETC. ETC
VILAS V. SANGHAI Vs. SUMERMAL MISHRIMAL BAFNA & ANR
14. In the instant case, the alleged criminal contempt was of a subordinate Court and therefore, the action could have been taken on a reference made to the High Court by the subordinate Court or on a Motion made by the Advocate General, but the proceedings had been initiated in pursuance of an application submitted by Full Judgment
STATE OF H.P & ORS Vs. RAJESH CHANDER SOOD ETC ETC
In our opinion, since the employees of Government companies are not Government servants, they have absolutely no legal right to claim that the Government should pay their salary or that the additional expenditure incurred on account of revision of their pay-scales should be met by the Government. Being employees of the companies, it is the responsibility of the companies to pay them salary and if the company is Full Judgment
NAGARPLAIKA THAKURDWARA Vs. KHALIL AHMED & ORS
So as to avail advantage of the provisions of Section 102 of the CPC, the subject matter of the original suit should be only recovery of money and that too, not exceeding Rs.25,000/-. If the subject matter of the suit is anything other than recovery of money or something more than recovery of money, provisions of Section 102 of the CPC cannot be invoked. 16. In the instant case, the original suit was not Full Judgment
NITU Vs. SHEELA RANI AND ORS
It is pertinent to note that in this case the pension is to be given under the provisions of the Scheme and therefore, only the person who is entitled to get the pension as per the Scheme would get it. family pension does not form part of the estate of the deceased and therefore, even an employee has no right to dispose of the same in his Will by giving a direction that Full Judgment
GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD Vs. L&T INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS LTD. AND ANR
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU Vs. STATE REP.BY DY.COMM.OF POLICE
…For the present, it may be sufficient to state that the gist of the offence of criminal conspiracy created under Section 120-A is a bare agreement to commit an offence. It has been made punishable under Section 120-B. The offence of abetment created under the second clause of Section 107 requires that there must be something more than a Full Judgment