Judgments
MEARS GROUP INC. Vs. FERNAS INSAAT A.S. (FERNAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC)
GREAVES COTTON LIMITED Vs. UNITED MACHINERY AND APPLIANCES
CORRESPONDENT, ANAIKAR ORIENTAL (ARABIC) HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ANR. Vs. A. HAROON AND ANR.
BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
UNION OF INDIA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
KARMA DORJEE & ORS Vs. U.O.I & ORS
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE AND ORS Vs. ABRAR ALI
SHARAT BABU DIGUMARTI Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SURESH KUMAR NANGIA AND ORS.
RATTAN LAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
JIVANLAL Vs. PRAVIN KRISHNA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.
CENTURY 21 MALLS PVT LTD Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RADHA NAGPAL & ORS.
HARYANA VIDHYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. Vs. HARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ANR.
M/S ALCON ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. Vs. CELEM S.A. OF FOS 34320 ROUJAN, FRANCE & ANR.
HDFC SECURITIES LTD.& ORS. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
However, it appears to us that this order under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. requiring investigation by the police, cannot be said to have caused an injury of irreparable nature which, at this stage, requires quashing of the investigation. We must keep in our mind that the stage of cognizance would arise only after the investigation report is filed before the Magistrate. Full Judgment
PRESIDENT,VIDYA PRASARAK SAMITHI,RAMDURG Vs. DY.COMMR.,BELGAUM DIST. & ORS.
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. Vs. STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE
CEO, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD AND ANR Vs. K HANUMANTHA RAO AND ANR
The impugned order is also faulted for the reason that it is not the function of the High Court to impose a particular punishment even in those cases where it was found that penalty awarded by the employer is shockingly disproportionate. In such a case, the matter could, at the best, be remanded to the disciplinary authority for imposition of lesser punishment leaving it to such authority to consider Full Judgment