Judgments
JAGMAL & ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
PRABHAKARA ADIGA Vs. GOWRI AND ORS
Singular question involved in the matter is executability of decree for permanent injunction against the legal representatives of judgment- debtor. It is crystal clear from a perusal of section 50(2) CPC that a decree for permanent injunction can be executed against the judgment debtor or his legal representatives. Normally personal action dies with person but this principle has application to limited kinds of causes of actions. In our considered opinion the Full Judgment
BHIKAN SK.NOOR MOHD Vs. MEHAMOODABEE SK.AFZAL & ORS.
Narendra Pandey Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr
Managing Director Vs State Of M.P.
Thus, as the Marico Industries Limited, Mumbai has not been arraigned as an accused, therefore, the prosecution of the applicant in his official capacity is not permissible because he cannot be vicariously held liable for the offence committed by the Company unless and until, the Company which is a juristic entity is arraigned as an accused. Full Judgment
JAYANTILAL CHIMANLAL PATEL Vs. VADILAL PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL
Radheshyam Kashyap alias Radhe Versus The State Of Chhattisgarh
Devshree Bandhe Versus Chhattisgarh State & Oth.
Devshree Bandhe Versus Chhattisgarh State & Oth. Full Judgment
Mrs. Indu Batni and 1 ano. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
JITENDER ARORA & ORS. Vs. SUKRITI ARORA & ORS.
She has developed her personality and formed her opinion after considering all the attendant circumstances. Her intellectual characteristics are adequately developed. She is able to solve problems, think about her future and understands the long term effects of the decision which she has taken. We also find Full Judgment
MEHMOODA GULSHAN Vs. JAVAID HUSSAIN MUNGLOO
Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short question arising for consideration. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy and Full Judgment