Judgments
AJAY SINGH AND ANR AND ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR
Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the courts to conduct Full Judgment
THE STATE OF TELANGANA Vs. HABIB ABDULLAH JEELANI & ORS.
The seminal issue that arises for consideration in this appeal, by special leave, is whether the High Court while refusing to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to interfere in an application for quashment of the investigation, can restrain the investigating agency not to arrest the accused persons during the course of investigation. There Full Judgment
KESHAV ARJUN CHARANIA Vs. INDIRA KESHAV CHARANIA
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Vs. TUHIN SULTAN MALLICK AND ORS
Uttam Chand Verma & Anr. v. State of M.P. & Ano.
Upendra Tripathi & another Vs. State of M.P. & another
COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. M/S.UNITED SPIRITS LTD.& ANR.
In view of the aforesaid analysis, we are constrained to remit the matter to the tribunal for reconsideration of the aforesaid aspects on the basis of observations made hereinabove and the law in the field. However, we may proceed to state that we have not expressed anything on the merits of the case including the imposition of penalty and interest. We expect the tribunal shall advert to each Full Judgment
SECRETARY MAHATAMA GANDHI MISSION & ARN. Vs. BHARTIYA KAMGAR SENA AND ORS
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SECRETARY, LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANR. Vs. GAUTAM CHOPRA & ORS.
GAUTAM JAIN Vs. U.O.I.& ANR.
This provision commands communication of the grounds on which the order of detention has been passed and to afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order. In the instant case, the documents containing the statement of Pooran Chand Sharma were not given and for this very reason, the High Court rightly held that such a ground cannot be relied upon by the respondents in support Full Judgment