Judgments
Rohit Agrawal Versus The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-II & another
Law laid down - Law relating to revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Full Judgment
Niharika Tiwari Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - The OMR answer sheets having scanned twice one after, interpolation in the OMR answer books was found to be a justified case for use of unfair means and thus order of cancellation of admission was maintained. Use of white fluid in the OMR answer sheets have been found to be valid invocation of unfair means as except the black ballpoint pen and the admit card no other accessories were permitted in the examination Full Judgment
Chhindwara Plus Developers Limited Vs. Union of India & Others
RITES LIMITED Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-V
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED Vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 12
M.S. BADHAN Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
SHRI ADYA KATYANI SHAKTIPEETH MANDIR TRUST Vs. STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) &ORS
MRB PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. & OTHERS Vs. SPLENDOR LANDBASE LIMITED
ASHOK SIRPAUL Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
The whole question hinges around whether dismissing the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. moved by the petitioner will cause grave injustice/prejudice to him? The answer is YES. However, looking into the above facts and circumstances, to avoid serious prejudice going to be caused qua against the petitioner, as the witnesses, i.e. PW1, PW13 and PW15, are the material witnesses and they have not been able to cross-examined by the petitioner due the circumstances discussed above. The right to cross-examination which Full Judgment