Filter by Date
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Neelam Devi Vs. State Of U.P. & Ors.

APPLICATION U/s 378, 4994 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S A H WHEELER PVT LTD AND ORS Vs. BANK OF BARODA AND ORS

W.P.(C), 6615 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

M/S. CITICORP FINANCE (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. Vs. MATHEN JOSEPH

RFA, 695 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

HARE KRISHNA MISHRA Vs. STATE

BAIL APPLN., 247 of 2016, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT Vs. P.S. VERMA

RSA, 106 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. Vs. RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED

ARB.P, 22 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANIL KUMAR ANAND Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

LPA, 15 of 2016, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K R MANGALAM WORLD SCHOOL Vs. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION

LPA, 499 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Gauhati High Court (Single Judge)

BABUL BHUYAN VS THE STATE OF ASSAM

CRL.A, 175 of 2009, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Gauhati High Court (Single Judge)

DR CHANDRA BAROOAH VS ASSAM SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL & ORS

WP(C), 1834 of 2008, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Gauhati High Court (Single Judge)

LAKHI SAIKIA & 3 ORS VS THE STATE OF ASSAM

CRL.A, 173 of 2009, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KIM STEEL STRIPS PVT LTD. AND ANR Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS

WRIT PETITION, 5654 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

The Gwalior Sugar Company Ltd. Dabra Vs. Rama Erection Pvt. Ltd. & Others.

WRIT PETITION, 1213 of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

  Section 23 of the Registration Act, 1908, prescribes time limit for presentation of an executed document for registration, but it does not prescribe any time limit for Registering Authority to register or refuse registration of such document. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sangram & Ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 758 of 1997, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Law laid down - (1) Testimony of interested witnesses can be relied upon for conviction. (2) Some discrepancies in the testimony of witnesses which does not affect the case cannot be the basis for rejection of the evidence. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Mahipalsingh and Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 905 of 2009, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors.

Writ Petition (Civil), 114 of 2014, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NEERA YADAV Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATON

Appeal (Crl.), 253 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017

A perusal of the above provision makes it clear that if the elements of any of the three sub-clauses are met, the same would be sufficient to constitute an offence of ‘criminal misconduct’ under Section 13(1)(d). Undoubtedly, all the three wings of clause (d) of Section 13(1) are independent, alternative and disjunctive. Thus, under Section 13(1)(d)(i) obtaining any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage by corrupt or illegal means by a public servant in itself would amount to criminal misconduct. On Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAJIV KUMAR Versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 251 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017

The essential ingredients of the offence of criminal conspiracy are: (i) an agreement between two or more persons; (ii) the agreement must relate to doing or causing to be done either (a) an illegal act; or (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. It is, therefore, plain that meeting of minds of two or more persons for doing or causing to be done an illegal act or an act by illegal means Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Renu Singh Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt. & Ors.

SERVICE SINGLE, 15678 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017

Full Judgment

Bombay High Court (Single Judge)

PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs POMA-EX PRODUCTS AND 15 ORS

NOTICE OF MOTION, 2695 of 2016, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017

Full Judgment