Judgments
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SURAJ PAL (D) THR. LR. Versus RAM MANORATH & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/s. Sunder Marketing Associates versus State of Haryana & Ors.
Tags Work Contract
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
VIHAR DURVE Vs THE STATES OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAW AND JUDICIARY DEPT.
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
Hindustan Media Ventures Ltd. Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Tags Appointment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Roop Narayan Sahu -Versus- State of M.P. & others
Tags Appointment
Bombay High Court (Single Judge)
SANJAY S/O BHIMRAO DAHAKE Vs THE STATE OF MAH.THR.PSO.CHANDRAPUR
Tags Abetment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
SH. JAGDISH SINGH Vs. MS. RACHNA BANSAL
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SOHAIL ABDUL RASHID SHAIKH Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SHAKIR ABDUL LATIF Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Tags Murder
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
BABURAO KASHINATH SARATKAR & 11 OTHERS Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA &2 OTHERS
Tags Land Acquisition
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S ANIKET COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORK Vs ASSTT.PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SURAJPRASAD @ RAJKUMAR S/O SHIVCHARAN ROY (IN JAIL) Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH P.S.O. P.S. GHUGGUS, CHANDRAPUR
Bombay High Court (Single Judge)
SYED IQBAL SYED AZIZ Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PARATWADA TQ ACHALPUR DISTT AMRAVATI
Tags Attempt To Murder
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
J. Vasanthi & Ors. VERSUS N. Ramani Kanthammal (D) Rep. by LRs. & Ors.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Union of India and Ors. Versus Ex LAC Nallam Shiva
To put it differently, in the fact situation of the present case, it is not possible to hold that the punishment of dismissal was vindictive, unduly harsh or disproportionate to the offence committed by the respondent and especially after the Tribunal has positively concluded that failure of the respondent to communicate either to his unit or to the nearest military stationf or around 1½ years was uncondonable. Ordinarily, the Tribunal ought not to interfere with the order of punishment except Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
ANAND KUMAR Vs. THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ANR
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
NAVEEN BHATIA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRs Vs. RAJ KUMARI BHATIA AND ORS.
Tags Will