Judgments
Anil Pandre Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Conviction can be based on the circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
JAGBIR SINGH Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar VERSUS Rameshwar Lal & Anr.
Smt. Vidyavati Singh Versus Harvinder Singh And Others
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jabalpur & another
Law Laid Down: (i) Limitation -inordinate delay in filing reference is required to be dealt with by the Labour Court in its proper perspective – In the present case, application for reinstatement was filed after 4 years, the same is held liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. Reliance is placed on Prabhakar vs Joint Director, Sericulture Department and another, (2015) 15 SCC 1 (ii) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 25 - B(2)(a)(ii) - Burden of proof – Full Judgment
Surya Prakash Vs. Smt. Rachna
Law Laid Down - If there is any instance of domestic violence, for which an affirmative or prohibitory order is passed under Section 18 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the provisions of Section 31 of the Act can be invoked. Non-payment of maintenance allowance is also a breach of 'protection order' or 'interim protection order'. The order passed in Sunil @ Sonu vs. Sarita Chawla (Smt.), reported in 2009 (5) MPHT 319 is in accordance with Full Judgment
Smt. Shanti Bavaria Vs. State of M.P. & Others
Law Laid down - It is not necessary to obtain personal sanction of His Excellency, Governor of Madhya Pradesh for taking decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings, and if the council of Ministers have taken such decision, it will serve the purpose and meet the requirement of Rule 9 of the Pension Rules. Reliance is placed upon State of Madhya Pradesh and others Vs. Dr. Yashwant Trimbak, AIR 1996 SC 765 & Samsher Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab, (1974) 2 Full Judgment
Leela Bai Vs. Manorama Bai
Law laid down - The first appellate court while reversing the finding of the trial Court must record its finding in clear terms and explain how the reasonings of the trial Court are erroneous. Full Judgment
Santhini Versus Vijaya Venketesh
Referred Cases 1, KRISHNA VENI NAGAM Vs. HARISH NIGAM 2, K.A. Abdul Jaleel vs T.A. Shahida 3, SHAMIMA FAROOQUI Vs. SHAHID KHAN 4, MAUSAMI MOITRA GANGULI VERSUS JAYANT GANGULI 5, ROSY JACOB Vs.JACOB A. CHAKRAMAKKAL 6, Vikram Vir Vohra Versus Shalini Bhalla 7, The State Of Maharashtra vs Dr. Praful B. Desai 8, Malthesh Gudda Pooja Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors 9, Budhadev Karmaskar versus State of West Bengal 10, MACKINNON MACKENZIE & CO. LTD Vs. AUDREY D’COSTA & ANR 11, Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors 12, Arun Kumar Agrawal Full Judgment
ARJUN GOPAL AND OTHERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
SUKHENDU DAS Versus RITA MUKHERJEE
PLASTIBLENDS INDIA LIMITED VERSUS ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI & ANR.
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Versus BRIJESH SINGH @ ARUN KUMAR AND ANR.
Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy(Dead) through LRs. VERSUS Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao & Ors.
Smt. Saroj Rajak & another Vs. State of M.P.
Democratic Lawyers Forum Vs. Union of India & Others
Law Laid down - (1) Public Interest Litigation in service matters like selection, appointment, promotion, seniority and also disciplinary proceedings is not maintainable. Reliance is placed upon Janata Dal Vs. H.S. Choudhary, (1992) 4 SCC 305; Rajnit Prasad Vs. Union of India, (2000) 9 SCC 313; and, Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha Vs. Dhobei Sahoo and others, (2014) 1 SCC 161. (2) A citizen has a fundamental right to meet a person of his choice. Reliance is placed upon Writ Petition Full Judgment