Judgments
Shailendra Kumhare Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
Suresh Mathur(since deceased) through his LRs vs. Yogesh Chawla
Munawwar Ali & others Versus Union of India & others
Law Laid Down - Merely because a person has a locus standi to file the writ petition, does not mean that he is entitled to any equitable or legal relief in writ jurisdiction. Equitable relief on the ground of adverse possession against the State - Negated. Supreme Court judgments reported as (2000) 5 SCC 652 (State of Rajasthan vs. Harphool Singh); (2011) 10 SCC 404 (State of Haryana vs. Mukesh Kumar) and (2014) 1 SCC 669 (Gurdwara Sahib vs. Gram Panchayat Village Full Judgment
M/S. SRD NUTRIENTS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI
Rohit Tandon :Versus: The Enforcement Directorate
Uttarakhand Transport Corporation (Earlier known as U.P.S.R.T.C.) & Ors. Versus Sukhveer Singh
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS VERSUS MAJ. GEN. MANOMOY GANGULY, VSM
National Institute of Medical Science University Rajasthan & Anr. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors
Kerala Private Hospital Association VERSUS State of Kerala & Ors.
Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. VERSUS M. Mani
SANJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SRINIVASRAO UDAMALA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
THAKUR DAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Rajendra Singh Versus Rajendra Singh And State of M.P & Others
Puspraj Singh Baghel Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law Laid Down - Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991 raises a statutory presumption that if the certificate of registration is valid, the transport vehicle is presumed to be in use or kept for use. The same cannot be disputed only for the reason that in absence of fitness certificate, the owner of the vehicle is absolved to pay the tax under the said Adhiniyam. Followed: Division Bench judgment dated 03.10.2017 rendered in W.P. No.14557/2017 Full Judgment