Judgments
Ramadhar @ Daddi Kachhi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (I) If, in presence of the accused at his house something wrong has happened with his wife, then in view of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, he is under burden to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed. (II) Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
LACHHMAN DASS VERSUS RESHAM CHAND KALER AND ANR
M/S INDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZER CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED VERSUS M/S BHADRA PRODUCTS
ISSAC @ KISHOR VERSUS RONALD CHERIYAN AND ORS.
ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD VERSUS RABI SANKAR PATRO & ORS.
Vikram Singh Paur Late Shri Tukoji Rao Paur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kripal Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Evidence of the prosecutrix is similar to evidence of the injured-complainant or witness. The testimony of the prosecutrix if found to be reliable, per se, may be sufficient to convict a culprit and no corroboration of her evidence is necessary. In prosecution of rape, law does not require corroboration. Absence of injury – external or internal, on the body of the prosecutrix would not render the testimony of the prosecutrix unreliable. Full Judgment
Sunita Singh Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others
State of Punjab and Ors. Versus Thuru Ram
ANIL & ORS Versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS
SHRI NAGAR MAL AND ORS VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS
RAMRAO LALA BORSE AND ANR VERSUS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR
PAPPU AND ORS. VERSUS VINOD KUMAR LAMBA AND ANR.
ATUL THAKUR VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC.
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. VERSUS M/S. DATAR SWITCHGEAR LIMITED & ORS.
THEIRY SANTHANAMAL VERSUS VISWANATHAN & ORS.
VIACOM 18 MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Smt. Simmi Dhillo Versus Jagdish Prasad Dubey and another
Khemchand Kachhi Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Admissibility of statement tendered by an accused to the police – Extra-judicial confession, admissibility of the evidence of statement under Section 6 of the Evidence Act, res gestae. Full Judgment
Guddu & Durga Shankar Yadav & others Vs. The State of M.P.
Law laid down - To substantiate a charge under Section 302 with the aid of Section 34, it must be shown that the criminal act complained against was done by one of the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention of the both. Common intention has to be distinguished from same or similar intention. Full Judgment