Judgments
A. Dharmalingam (Dead) by LRs VERSUS V. Lalithambal & Ors. etc. etc.
OSAMA AZIZ AND ANR :Versus: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
MOHAR SAI AND ANR :Versus: GAYATRI DEVI AND ORS.
NISHAN SINGH & ORS :Versus: ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH REGIONAL MANAGER & ORS
Prof. Chintamani Malviya Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Smt. Kamla Yadav and Others vs. State of MP and Another
BHASKARRAO & ORS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Niharika Shukla & others Vs. State of M.P. & others
Law Laid Down - The statutory Rule contemplates that the educational qualification for appointment as Assistant Professor is “as prescribed by the University Grants Commission”, therefore, there is no contradiction between the UGC Regulations and/or statutory Rules framed. There is no reason to question the wisdom of the State Government in grouping the allied subjects with the relevant subjects as none of the subject could be pointed out to be unconcerned or unrelated with the relevant subjects. Still further, the State Government Full Judgment
Naresh & Ors. Versus The State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
Shiv Singh & Ors. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
Sri Y.P. Sudhanva Reddy & Ors Versus The Chairman And Managing Director, Karnataka Milk Federation Etc.
Vishwasrao Satwarao Naik & Ors Versus State of Maharashtra
Rakesh Kumar and Others vs. State of MP and Anr.
Monu @ Saurabh Kumar Chaturvedi Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law Laid Down - The offence under the unamended provision of Sec. 3(1)(x) of the 1989 Act – The victim is Project Officer – The insult and intimidation was directed against the Project Officer arising out of victim's resistence in allowing joining of sister-in- law of the accused- Insult and intimidation was directed against the Project Officer and not against the SC / ST status / capacity of the Project Officer- Thus offence u/s 3(1) (x) not made out even on Full Judgment