Judgments
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
State of Tamil Nadu Versus Siddaramaiah, Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka & Ors.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Kalawati (D) Through LRs. & Ors versus Rakesh Kumar & Ors.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
JAYANT VERMA & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(Gwalior) M.P. Ltd VERSUS Commissioner of Income Tax, Gwalior
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
D. SRINIVAS VERSUS SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY S.N. SHUKLA Versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
A.A. PADMANBHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
Tags Education
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SHAJAHAN Versus STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
Zx Security Services And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And 10 Others
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Bagherwal Versus Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu
Tags Appointment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Rohani Prasad Kushwaha and others Vs.High Court of M.P.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED versus ABDUL SAMAD & ANR.
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Ramkumar Sahu Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Tags Offence
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
ACC Limited Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Sanjay Malveeya & others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
SHUBH LAXMI GRIH NIRMAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT, INDORE THROUGH : PRESIDENT GOPALDAS Vs. SURESH @ GOPAL S/O AMBARAM AND FIVE OTHERS
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
Angad Prasad Vishwakarma VersusThe State of Chhattisgarh
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Manish Makhija Vs. Central Bank of India and others
Law laid down - Section 14(1) of the Securitisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002- satisfaction of Magistrate- not specifically required to be recorded. The satisfaction is regarding adjudicating that nine points of declaration are covered in the affidavit. It does not call for any modicum of enquiry into the veracity or justification or the decision of declaration or any aspect thereof. Even if the word “satisfaction” is not recorded by the Magistrate but his Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Sampatbai & others. Vs. Smt. Kamlabai & others.
Tags Fees And Tax