Judgments
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar
R. S. Ashatkar Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Bhopal
Principal, Maharshi Vidya Mandir Lehdra Naka, Sagar Vs. Labour Court, Sagar & Another
Law Laid Down - The scheme of the M.P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 particularly of Rule 10-A and Sub-rule (1) and (2) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules makes it abundantly clear that the notice of the first hearing is not required to be given when the party has already appeared before the Labour Court on the basis of the notice issued by the Court. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules is not mandatory but pertains to matter of procedure and therefore, it Full Judgment
STATE OF M.P. Vs. Munna @ Shahnwaj
Kamal Singh & Ors. Versus Bhav singh Rajpoot & Ors.
Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs And Service Tax, Raipur Chhattisgarh Versus M/s Vimla Infrastructure India Pvt. Ltd. Nehru Nagar, Dhamtari Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
UNION OF INDIA VERSUS INDIAN RADIOLOGICAL AND IMAGING ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
Padam Singh and others Vs. Radhelal and others
Law laid down - Order 21 Rule 97 CPC 1. A person raising objection must show some prima-facie pleadings and material in his objection which makes it adjudicatable. 2. Executing Court is duty bound to examine the availability of bonafide adjudicatory material. 3. The adjudication mentioned in this provision need not essentially involved a detailed enquiry or collection of evidence. The Court can undertake the exercise of adjudication even on the allegations made by the obstructor. 4. In absence of minimum essential prima-facie pleadings Full Judgment
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA VERSUS A.K. BALAJI AND ORS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. :Versus: RAGHUWAR PAL SINGH
The General Manager and another Vs. M/s Raisingh and Company
Law Laid Down - The extension in time does not extend the period of completion of the agreement. It only permits the Contractor to complete works subject to payment of liquidated damages, as agreed to. Liquidated damages are claimed on account of breach of the contract and such amount cannot be said to be unreasonable or is by way of penalty. In absence of any allegation that the Award passed by the Arbitrator is against the public policy, liquidated damages imposed in Full Judgment
Rameshwar & Others VERSUS State of Haryana & Others
Sivakami & Ors. VERSUS State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. Versus KURIEN E. KALATHIL AND ANR.
Common Cause (A Regd. Society) Versus Union of India and Another
Smt. Megha Singh Sindhe Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law Laid Down - 1. Vague, unspecific and sweeping allegations of cruelty against the sister-in-law (Nanad) who was residing elsewhere are insufficient to sustain a charge-sheet u/S. 304-B of IPC in the absence of any other cogent and compelling evidence pointing towards subjection of prosecutrix to dowry demand related cruelty. Full Judgment
Sandeep Jain vs. Mrs. Nivedita Jain
Law laid down - Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act- 1.In determining the amount of maintenance income/financial position of the wife’s parents or other relations is immaterial. 2. Merely because the wife is well qualified, no presumption can be drawn that:- (i) she is in a position to maintain herself. (ii) she is out of employment on her own volition (iii) If she is not in a job it is due to her inaction 3. No set formula can be laid for fixing the amount Full Judgment
Prabhulal and 3 others Vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid down - If the incident took place suddenly without any premeditation, the accused persons merely on the ground that they assaulted simultaneously cannot be held guilty for causing injury or death for sharing common intention with each other. In such circumstances, they are responsible for their individual act. Reliance is place in the case of Balu vs. State (UT of Pondicheery) {2016} 15 SCC 471. Full Judgment