Judgments
Raghuveer Singh and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Where witnesses make inconsistent statements in their evidence either at one stage or at two stages, testimony of such witnesses become unreliable and unworthy of credence and in absence of special circumstances, no conviction can be based on the evidence of such witnesses. (2) Material improvements of version of eye-witness from FIR to the version given in the Court, said evidence cannot be taken into consideration. (3) Failure on part of investigating agency to recover any bloodstained Full Judgment
THE KERALA ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS ASSOCIATIO :Versus: THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
MS. X . VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.
Amrit Paul Singh & Anr VERSUS TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Kiran Pal Singh VERSUS The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
District Basic Education Officer Allahabad VERSUS Sushila Jaiswal (Dead) through her Lrs and Ors.
Vaijnath Kondiba Khandke Versus State of Maharashtra and Another
M/s Goel Roadways Vs. State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid Down - The argument of the petitioner that the respondent could pick and choose a particular property to assess the net worth of the tenderer is not acceptable as the respondents cannot resort to such method to assess the net worth of the tenderer. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered with while exercising writ jurisdiction of this Court, as this Court while exercising power of judicial Full Judgment
Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai Patel Versus Rajivbhai Dudabhai Patel & Others
R. Balakrishna Bhat & Ors. etc. VERSUS Bank of Baroda & Ors. etc.
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VERSUS BABY P.P. & ORS
Naushad Ali Versus Mubarak Ali @ Bhura
Law laid down - Revision against the order passed in an election petition under the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961, Security deposit alongwith memo of Revision Petition under Rule 19(2) of Rules 1962 is mandatory. Security amount has to be deposited alongwith the revision petition. High Court has no discretion to condone the latches. Full Judgment
Rupinder Singh Sandhu Versus State of Punjab & Others
GURMEET PAL SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
SELVI Versus GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS.
KHURSHID AHMED VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MANOJ KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SUSHILA AGGARWAL & ORS. VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
R.L. Jatav Vs. Station House Officer
Law Laid Down - A trial court while rendering a judgment in trial is empowered to direct the police to register an offence against one of the witnesses against whom the trial court while marshalling the evidence finds prima facie material of committing cognizable offence. By doing so, the trial court would not be overstepping its jurisdictional purview as the provision of Section 154 Cr.P.C. obliges the police to register an FIR on receipt of information of commission of cognizable offence from Full Judgment