Judgments
SANDEEP WASKALE Vs. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANOTHER
Premnarayan Yadav Vs. State of MP & another
Manoj Kumar Vs. State of MP & others
Law laid down - The peon and salesman etc. appointed in country/foreign liquor shops run by the excise department and were terminated 4-5 years thereafter on account of the subsequent change in policy to auction such shops, are not entitled to regularization/absorption in government service as they do not fulfill the requisite conditions contained in the scheme dated 16/5/2007 framed by the State government on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Full Judgment
Jehangir D. Mehta Vs. The Real Nayak Sakh Sahkari Maryadit and Another
Law laid down - The order or decision of the arbitration council under Section 57 of the Madhya Pradesh Swayatta Sahakarita Adhiniyam, 1999 is an arbitration award and it is not a decree passed by the civil court as defined under Section 2(2) of the CPC, hence the stamp duty as required by the Schedule 1A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1889 is payable for its execution. Full Judgment
N. Radhakrishnan @ Radhakrishnan Varenickal VERSUS Union of India and others
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Versus Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee
R. S. Sehrawat :Versus: Rajeev Malhotra & Ors
Shivaraj :Versus: Rajendra & Anr.
Smt. Kavita :Versus: The State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary & Ors.
SK RAJU @ ABDUL HAQUE @ JAGGA Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL
YASHWANT ETC. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Haribhau VERSUS The State of Maharashtra
K.R.Bhagat Versus Parmeshwar Dayal Pathak
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD VERSUS ASHALATA BHOWMIK AND ORS.
Anil Kumar VERSUS Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
KAILASH SINGH Versus THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, MAYO COLLEGE, AJMER & ORS.
Gajanand S/o Chamru Lal @ Bhuria Lohar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - An act of attempt to commit an offence is totally different from an act of preparation to commit an offence. There is no evidence that after laying down on the prosecutrix, the appellant in order to commit rape put his penis on the vagina of the prosecutrix or made any further attempt to penetrate in the vagina of the prosecutrix or touch any sensual organ with hand. Hence, the act which has been proved shows only preparation. Moreso, Full Judgment