Judgments
Janabai VERSUS Additional Commissioner and Others
Referred Cases - 1, ABHIRAM SINGH Vs. C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS.& ORS. 2, Jagdev Singh Sidhanti vs Pratap Singh Daulta 3, Sankar Dastidar VS Shrimati Banjula Dastidar & Anr Full Judgment
SUSHIL KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANR. Vs HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.
Law Laid Down: The Court cannot be indulgent to the petitioners as there may be many other candidates whose applications might have been received after the cut-off date as against more than 1200 applications received within time. Thus, the application forms of the petitioners cannot be directed to be accepted on account of postal delay. The petitioners can seek their remedy against the postal department for delay but the High Court cannot be directed to accept the application forms received after Full Judgment
Madhav vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Deposition of Investigating Officer-A public servant must be presumed to act honestly and conscientiously and their evidence has to be assessed on its intrinsic worth and cannot be discarded. Plea of Private Defence- Even if an accused does not plead self defence, it is open to the court to consider such a plea if the same arises from the material on record. Common intention under Section 34 of IPC- "Common Intention" implies a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to the Full Judgment
RajKumar Raghuvanshi {Lakhera} Vs. Smt. Radha Lakhera & Anr.
Manish Surekha & Anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Defence of the accused cannot be considered at the stage of framing of charge. It can be considered at an appropriate stage/defence evidence. Full Judgment
Kishorilal Dubey Vs. Premchand Shrivastava (deceased) through L.Rs. Smt.Shail Shrivastava & Others
Law laid down - "Whether the benefit of Section 14(1) of the Limitation Act can be given to the respondents when the earlier suit was decided by the Court who is competent to decide the same" Held - No. “Whether when the earlier suit was decided on merits, the subsequent suit for the same relief is maintainable.” Held- No. Full Judgment
L. Ponnayal @ Lakshmi Versus Karuppannan (Dead) Thr. L.R. Sengoda Gounder & Anr.
Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Versus Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others
Law Laid Down: The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new right Full Judgment