Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

OM PRAKASH AGARWAL SINCE DECEASED THR. LRS. & ORS. VERSUS VISHAN DAYAL RAJPOOT & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 9051­-9052 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Tenancy
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Powai Panchsheel Co­op Hsg. Society & Anr. VERSUS Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) & Ors.

Appeal (Civil), 7608 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Dahisar Saraswati Co­op. Housing Society Ltd Versus State of Maharashtra & Others

Appeal (Crl.), 1550 of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Acquittal
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

The Life Insurance Corporation of India VERSUS Sri Kalappa M. Sankad (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors

Appeal (Civil), 10574 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives Versus State of Karnataka & Ors.

Appeal (Crl.), 1281-82 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

SEBASTIANI LAKRA & ORS. VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 10588­-89 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

MOHAMMED IMRAN VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Appeal (Civil), 10571 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

A Suo Moto Taken Writ Petition Versus State Of Chhattisgarh

Writ Petition (227), 299 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Smt. (Dr.) Sajni Bajaj Vs. Indore Development Authority & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 15286 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Kalyan Singh Versus State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 489 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Jagdish Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 1112 of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

B.K. EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS PARAG GUPTA AND ASSOCIATES

Appeal (Civil), 23988 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Limitation
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Vedanta Ltd. Versus Shenzen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Co. Ltd

Appeal (Civil), 10394 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Narmada Prasad Versus Murarilal

MA->MISC. APPEAL, 794 of 2004, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Saurabh Singh Baghel & Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others

WRIT PETITION, 18935 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Taranjeet Singh Hora & Anr. Vs. State of M.P.

MCRC, 18921 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Law laid down - [1] After registration of the first FIR the subsequent FIR for offence committed in the course of same transaction or offence arising as a consequence of prior offence, is not permissible and the subsequent complaint in such cases applying the test of “sameness” and “consequence” can be treated as statement under Section 161(3) of the Cr.P.C. in the FIR already registered but if the subsequent complaint is in regard to same incident but filed as a counter Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Rajesh Singh

Criminal Appeal, 1665 of 2000, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Law laid down - Penetration is sufficient to constitute sexual intercourse for offence of rape. Complete penetration is not essential. Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Novartis India Limited Vs. Vipin Shrivastava & others

WA, 75 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Law Laid Down - The supervisory capacity necessarily has to be examined keeping in view the manual, unskilled, skilled, clerical work and the person performing such work is a “workman”. Meeting different professionals to promote sale of product of Pharmaceutical Company cannot be said to be manual or clerical work done by the Medical Representatives as it requires knowledge of product, its uses and also persuasive skills. May be, the Medical Representative does not supervise any person but he is the Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS VERSUS RAZIYA KHANAM (D) THR. LRs AND ANOTHER

Appeal (Civil), 10379 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 10, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PRADEEP BISOI @ RANJIT BISOI VERSUS THE STATE OF ODISHA

Appeal (Crl.), 1192 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 10, 2018

Full Judgment