Judgments
State of Madhya Pradesh & others Vs. Ramlal Mahobia
Law Laid Down - The question of award of interest by the writ court is not controlled or regulated by Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It is the Interest Act, 1978, which empowers the Court to allow interest but at the rate not exceeding the current rate of interest in terms of Section 2(b) of the said Act. After discharging duties as an employee, it is the right of the employee to get salary; therefore, if the salary Full Judgment
M/s. Pratibha Syntex Ltd. & Ors. Versus M. P. Electricity Regulatory Commission & Others
KALPANA VYAS Versus RAJ KUMAR RANGWANI
S. Mahesh Versus The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Neyveli Tamil Nadu & Ors.
LT. GEN. MANOMOY GANGULY, VSM VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. Versus BALIRAM SINGH & ORS.
THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY REGISTRAR VERSUS SANGAM LAXMI BAI VIDYAPEET & ORS.
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN, S.R. EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST & ANR.
South Eastern Coalfields Limited Versus . Col. J.P.S. Yadav, Managing Director
Chhedilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Section 8, 9 and 10- the notification under Section 10(1) is required to be issued in respect of “vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit.” “Such land” is to be acquired by issuance of notification under Section 10(1) and 3 of the Act. However, determination of such excess vacant land is based on draft statement followed by final statement prepared under Section 8 and 9 of the Act. Once such Full Judgment
NATIONAL INSURANCE SPECIAL VOLUNTARY RETIRED/RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ANR. Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
S. SAROJINI AMMA VERSUS VELAYUDHAN PILLAI SREEKUMAR
Pankaj Ispat Limited Versus Union of India
RAMVIR VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Raj Kumar Kol Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid dow - Fingering into the vagina would be a rape within the definition of rape under Section 375 of IPC as substituted by Act No.13 of 2013 w.e.f. 03-02-2013. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts, nature, motive and the manner of the offence, capital punishment is commuted to the Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years and fine of Rs.10,000/-. Full Judgment
DALIP SINGH AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
JITENDRA @ KALLA VERSUS STATE OF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
GOPAL JHA VERSUS THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Veerendra Pratap Singh Versus Sanjaya Kumar Tibude
Law laid down - Amendment application based on subsequent developments can be allowed at any stage of the trial or appeal, if the same does not cause prejudice to the other side. The cross objection in the appeal against appellate order can be made. In cross objection a decree can be passed. The cross objection takes the place of appeal after it is filed. Suit for declaration of title filed without claiming a alternative relief of possession, the suit would not be barred Full Judgment