Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sourabh & Anr. vs. State of MP

Criminal Appeal, 483 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 01, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Kidnapping
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Aarya Maansingh Vs. State of M.P. & Others

WRIT PETITION, 7853 of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 01, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

REENA HAZARIKA VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM

Appeal (Crl.), 1330 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KAMIL VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Appeal (Crl.), 1568 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Mukhtyar Jabbar Tadvi Versus State of Maharashtra

Appeal (Crl.), 877 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST VERSUS SHEELA RAMCHANDRA TIKHE

Appeal (Civil), 10853 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Vijay Shukla vs. State of MP and Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 25811 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/s S.V.E.C. Construction Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others

AR, 07 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Law Laid Down - The question whether time is essence of contract or not, depends upon the intention of the parties. Here, the petitioner sought modification of work order so as to complete it within the time granted and then himself chose todetermine the contract. Thus, he understood that the time was essence of the contract. Such conduct of the petitioner as well as on behalf of the respondents shows that the parties intended to complete the contract within time frame. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Horam Versus State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 125 of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Goutam Singh Karoliya and another Vs. State of M.P. and another

MCRC, 593 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Awdhesh Singh Bhadauria Vs. State of M.P. & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 5718 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 31, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Kidnapping
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) VERSUS PANKAJ CHAUDHARY AND ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 2299 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MIZORAM VERSUS DR. C. SANGNGHINA

Appeal (Crl.), 1322 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANAGEMENT, HINDUSTAN MACHINE TOOLS LTD. VERSUS GHANSHYAM SHARMA

Appeal (Civil), 856 of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Kerala Versus Rasheed

Appeal (Crl.), 1321 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

J.S. Luthra Academy & Another Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir & Others

Appeal (Civil), 7184­7185 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 7326-7327 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Touheed Musalman Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 6090 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Law laid down - It is not appropriate to award ‘death sentence’ in every case. To award death sentence, some factors are necessary to be considered, such as the age of culprit, manner of commission of offence and possibilities of reformation of accused, etc. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Madhya Pradesh & others Vs. Jagdeo Singh

WA, 200 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Law Laid Down - Non-payment of some retiral dues on account of pendency of the revision against an order of acquittal of the writ-petitioner cannot be said to be a contumacious act on behalf of the State to deprive the writ-petitioner of his retiral dues. It was an action possible in law. However, since there is some delay, interest @6% per annum is ordered to be paid on the retiral dues to settle the equities between the parties. - Supreme Court Full Judgment

Tags Interest
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Reena Chachda vs. State of MP & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 25132 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment