Judgments
Hemant Bakolia Vs. State of MP & Ors.
Law laid down - Rounding off of the marks is not permissible contrary to the expressed language of the Rule containing the mandatory condition of obtaining atleast 50% marks in each paper. In a competitive examination each fraction of marks has a bearing on the result of the participating candidate and if in such a case rounding off of marks is allowed that will defeat the very principle of assessing comparative merit. No revaluation of answer sheet can be directed in the absence of any Full Judgment
Anil Vanshkar Vs. State of M.P. and Another
Law laid down - (I) Considering the amendment vide Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. on the touch stone of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it appears that personal liberty of an individual cannot lie at the mercy of presence of an “Informant”. (II) Code of Criminal Procedure is a procedural law and by the amendment incorporated under Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. impliedly penalises the applicant/ accused while withholding his bail application for an indefinite period which is not permissible in law. (III) Full Judgment
Anek Singh Tomar vs. Dhaniram S/o Shri Bhagchand (dead) through LRs.
Sabha Shanker Dube Versus Divisional Forest Officer & Ors
Skol Breweries Ltd. Vs. Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.
Law laid down - The High Court while deciding the appeal against rejection of temporary injunction and forming an opinion regarding prima facie case can examine the subsequent development took place during the pendency of appeal. Full Judgment
Ramswaroop vs. Matadin Shivhare (dead) through Lrs & Others
Bhikam Singh and Others vs. Ranveer Singh & Others
Employees Provident Fund Vs. M/s. Saraswati Ucchattar Madhyamik Vidhyala
Law Laid Down - The employees who avail the provident fund scheme under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 fall within the definition of "Consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as held by the Apex Court in Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Bhavani AIR 2008 SC 2957. Full Judgment
Lourembam Deben Singh & Ors. versus Union of India & Ors. etc.
TAMIL NADU DR.MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY Versus SVS EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL TRUST
SIVASANKAR V.K. Versus V.K. SIVAN AND OTHERS
PRATAP MEHTA VERSUS SUNIL GUPTA & ORS.
THE MANAGEMENT OF SRI RAMNARAYAN MILLS LTD. Versus SECRETARY COIMBATORE DISTRICT TEXTILE WORKERS UNION(HMS) AND ORS
North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation VERSUS Smt. Sujatha
M/s Fives Stein India Project Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata Versus State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1. The expression “shall” is not conclusive to determine the provision as directory or mandatory. The Court is required to ascertain the real intention of the Legislature which will include the examination, nature and design of the statute and the consequences. 2. In all cases, failure to perform a duty within the time limit, does not render the action a nullity. Where a provision lays down a period within which the public body should perform any function, the provision Full Judgment
M/S HINDON FORGE PVT. LTD. & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GHAZIABAD & ANR.
GEETA DEVI & ANR. Versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mohammad Shahid & Another
Law Laid Down - Evidence as to the cause of death is relevant not only in relation to the cause of death of the person making the statement but also to the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in death. In the suicide note when the prosecutrix has tried to convey that the accused were hungry (for sex) and that she became their food (victim), it clearly indicates that she was violated and that she did not want to live life of Full Judgment