Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Suresh Singh Bhadoria Versus Central Bureau of Investigtion

MCRC, 43165 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 26, 2018

Law laid down - In terms of Section 170(1) of CrPC, the investigating agency is mandated to produce an accused into custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence, cannot be accepted. Inherent power of judicial review under Section 482 of CrPC presupposes that the Court is required to see whether the trial Court has abused the process of law or it is necessary to annul the proceedings for securing the Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sachin Rathi Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and another

WRIT PETITION, 6411 of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 26, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Versus Surendra Kumar & Ors

Appeal (Civil), 11149 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

M.C. Mehta versus Union of India & Ors

Writ Petition (Civil), 4677 of 1985, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

South Delhi Municipal Corporation Versus SMS AAMW Tollways Private Ltd

Appeal (Civil), 11249 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

The Central Board of Secondary Education and Anr. Versus T.K. Rangarajan and Ors

Appeal (Civil), 11230 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Education
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s.Anik Industries Ltd Vs. M/s.DCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd

FA, 514 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2018

Law laid down - [a] If the arbitration clause is contained in the annexure to the contract document and the annexure is specifically mentioned therein, then the arbitration agreement exists between the parties. [b] Sec.8 of the Act mandates a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration in case whether pending action is subject matter of an arbitration agreement and in such cases the judicial authority does not commit any error in disposing of the civil action while referring the Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Mahendra Pratap Dubey :Versus: Managing Officer, Evacuee Property & Ors

Appeal (Civil), 6384 of 2010, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Vijay Pullarwar & Ors.:Versus: Shri Hanuman Deostan, a Public Trust through its Trustees

Appeal (Civil), 7789 of 2011, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Vimla Devi & Ors. VERSUSNational Insurance CompanyLimited & Ors.

Appeal (Civil), 11042 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sumer Singh Jat & Ors.Etc.Etc. VERSUSState of Rajasthan & Ors. Etc.Etc

Appeal (Civil), 11061 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Santosh @ Santosh Kumar VERSUS State of Kerala

Appeal (Crl.), 1409 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. VERSUS Engineering Workers’ Association & Ors.

Appeal (Civil), 11063 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Somdatt Mishra Vs. The State of M.P. & Another

MCRC, 8366 of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Law Laid down - 1- When a complainant is restrained by the public authority to commit any illegal act and with motive to overcome such situation, any complaint under section 354 of IPC or like nature has been filed against the public servant, then it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to investigate thoroughly and reach to the motive if any exist, for which the complaint has been filed against the public servant. 2- Harassment of the public servant on pretext Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Manju Pathak vs. Munshi Singh Gurjar

MP, 4985 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

RAJENDRA SINGH AND ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.

CRA, 681 of 2017, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Law Laid down - 1. Sec. 53-A and Sec. 164-A inserted in the Cr.P.C by way of Amendment  Act 2005 which makes the DNA profiling of accused and victim must, is a step towards more Forensic and Scientific Investigation. Therefore, if the DNA report is supported by medical evidence, wherein injuries to the prosecutrix are not sustained over the private parts or over her person and attending circumstances, do not corroborate in any manner, then false implication of the accused can Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Mahesh Singh Yadav vs. The State of MP

WRIT PETITION, 6542 of 2010, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Pay
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ku. Surabhi Baghel Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur

WRIT PETITION, 26346 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2018

Law laid down - Scope of interference – In academic matters in framing of questions, evaluation of answers and finalisation of model answers – the Court cannot and should not act as Court of appeal, but to leave the same to academicians and experts. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Anand Kumar Mohatta and Anr. Versus State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Department of Home and Anr

Appeal (Crl.), 1395 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 15, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

U.P. JAL NIGAM & ORS :Versus: AJIT SINGH PATEL & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 11017­-11018 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 15, 2018

Full Judgment