Judgments
PRAFULL CHAND, EX SGT 768805-R VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SANDEEP AGGARWAL VERSUS VINITI AGGARWAL
SAURABH KUMAR SINGH EX SGT 783053-S VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SAURABH SHARMA VERSUS SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (EAST) & ORS
A vehicle which is moving across the city, even if occupied at a given point in time by one person, would be a public place owing to the immediate risk of exposure to other persons under varying circumstances. Thus, a vehicle even if occupied by only one person would constitute a ‘public place’ and wearing of a mask therein, would be compulsory. The wearing of a mask or a face cover in a vehicle, which may be occupied by either Full Judgment
SHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND CO. PVT. LTD. VERSUS RATTAN INDIA POWER LTD & ANR
UMESH LOCHAB VERSUS THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VERSUS ANITA DEVI & ORS
Amandeep Singh Saran Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Dr. Manish Kumar Pandit Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Ramesh Kumar Sharma Versus State of Chhattisgarh
GURDEV SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB
Sonu Jain, Jiwan and Santosh vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Section 302/304 Part-II Indian Penal Code - Single blow- As a Rule of Thumb, it cannot be said that in no case of single blow or injury, accused cannot be convicted under Section 302 of IPC. In cases of single injury, the facts and circumstances of each case have to be taken into consideration before arriving at the conclusion whether the accused should be appropriately convicted under Section 302 or under Section 304 Part-II of IPC. Section 302 Full Judgment