Judgments
Purshottam Patwar Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Ors
Sudesh Kumar Rai and Anr Versus State of Chhattisgarh
NATASHA NARWAL VERSUS STATE OF DELHI NCT
DEVANGANA KALITA VERSUS STATE OF DELHI NCT
Piyush Kumar Sheth Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law laid down - 1. Government contract/tender - Notice inviting tender (NIT)-- Cancellation of – Judicial review – Judicial review is limited to see whether order/action is arbitrary, capricious, malafide or hits wednesbury principle – The element of public interest is also relevant which needs to be looked into. 2. Single tender - CVC guidelines – In the light of CVC guideline, it cannot be said that the decision to cancel the single tender is either arbitrary or unreasonable or actuated with malafide. Full Judgment
ASIF IQBAL TANHA VERSUS STATE OF DELHI NCT
Chhattisgarh Cement Carriers Versus Union Of India and ORS
HC/RO Md Hussain Versus Director General of Police
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD VERSUS DR SATYA PRAKASH GAUTAM & ANR
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA SHRAMIK UNION VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
RAJESH LAL VERSUS STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
SHAKUNTALA DEVI GOLYAN VERSUS STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
URVASHI AGGARWAL & ORS VERSUS INDERPAUL AGGARWAL
CHEN HSUI YUN VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
WG CDR KUSUM THAKURI VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
Radhey Shyam Nathani Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
Raju @ Vijay s/o Daulji Ahirwar V/s State of M.P & one another
Law laid down - The procedure prescribed under section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is to be adopted by the committee or board but where the accused claiming himself to be "Child in conflict with law" is produced before the Magistrate or Sessions Court empowered under Cr.P.C.to conduct trail and an objection is raised about juvenility at the time of commission of offence, the procedure prescribed under section 9 (2) of the JJ Act, Full Judgment