Judgments
The State of Odisha & Ors. Versus Orissa Private Engineering College Association (OPECA) & Anr.
THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. VERSUS LEESAMMA JOSEPH
SHAIK AHMED VERSUS STATE OF TELANGANA
Dharamsheela Kumari Vs. Hemant Kumar
AJAY GARG VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SASIKALA PUSHPA RAMASWAMY VERSUS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
SANJAY PRAKASH & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
BARUN KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
PRAMOD GIRI VERSUS STATE OF DELHI
RAM KISHAN VERSUS THE STATE
SUBHASH VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Sunil Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
ABC Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
Hirdesh Sahu s/o Jagdish Sahu Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The examination of the witness shall be held as expeditiously as possible; and the same shall be continued on day to day basis till its conclusion. The Judge ought to have seen the sensitivity of the matter and should not have given such long date for the purposes of cross[1]examination which has led to the material witness turning hostile, seriously jeopardizing and undermining the efforts made by the police officers to bring home the charges against the accused Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Versus M/S S.R. FERRO ALLOYS
Law Laid Down:- Railways Act, 1989 – Sec. 73 (Punitive charge for overloading a wagon), Sec.74 (Passing of property in the goods covered by railway receipt), Sec. 79 (Weighment of consignment on request of the consignee or endorsee); Railway (Punitive Charges for Overloading of Wagon) Rules, 2005 - Rule 3 (Punitive charges for overloading) – Questions (A) Whether the weighbridge at the point of re-weighment was defective at some point of time earlier and therefore, the claim of the Railways was Full Judgment
Yatindra Verma Vs. State of MP & Ors.
Law laid down - (1) Article 22(5) of Constitution of India - The right of detenu to represent against detention order is a valuable and constitutional right, violation of which can make the order of detention as illegal. (2) Constitution of India - Preventive Detention – is duly recognized in our constitutional scheme. The Constituent Assembly composed of politicians, statesman, lawyers and social workers who had experienced the imprisonment owing solely to their political beliefs resolved to put Article 22, Clause 3 Full Judgment