Judgments
Vedanta Ltd. (Formerly known as M/s Sesa Sterlite Ltd.) Versus The Goa Foundation & Ors.
AJIT MOHAN & ORS. VERSUS LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS.
DR. A. SURESH KUMAR & ORS. VERSUS AMIT AGARWAL
Arjun Kumar @ Prince Vs. The State Of Bihar
M/s Bihar Home Developers and Builders Vs. Shri Narendra Prasad Gupta
Sonu Bairwa Vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
Law Point - National Security Act, 1980 – Section 3(2) – It can be invoked in three contingencies and a citizen can be detained: i) for preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of State. ii) for preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. iii) for preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community. Interpretation of Statute – Use of “Explanation” – Explanation Full Judgment
Smt. Kantabai w/o Ashok Bhandari Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Section 82 (4) of Criminal Procedure Code for declaring an accused as a proclaimed offender is identical to Section 82 (1) of the Code. The only difference is the penal provisions for the same as provided under s.174A of IPC. The general principle that Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as (2012) 8 SCC 73 lays down is that for the purposes of an anticipatory bail, a proclaimed offender also includes an offender or a proclaimed Full Judgment
Nandkishore s/o Ganesh Ram Meghwal Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In case of issuance of summons/warrants against government employee/officer, the prosecution fails to procure their presence in Court, their salary/pension, as the case may be, can be withheld, if it is found that the government official is avoiding the summons/warrants. Full Judgment
Sonu @ Vikas Bhandari Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The order dated 12.05.2020 passed by the Gwalior Bench of this Court in the case of Balveer Singh Bundela v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.5621/2020) cannot be followed in the light of the subsequent order passed by the Division Bench of this court passed in the case of Arif Masood v. State of Madhya Pradesh passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.45501/2020 dated 27.11.2020. Judgments referred to: (1) Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as Full Judgment
Rajabeti Sakhwar and others Vs. Darshanlal Sakhwar and others
Vijay Baid and Ors Versus Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
DHARMESH @ DHARMENDRA @ DHAMO JAGDISHBHAI @ JAGABHAI BHAGUBHAI RATADIA & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Smt. Triveni Devi Vs. The Union of India
Omnarayan Sharma Vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
Law laid down:- (i) Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 and NALSA (Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation Schemes) Scheme, 2015 gives wide scope to the State Authority & District Authority to file appropriate legal proceedings to ensure that the complainant/beneficiary receives the benefit under the NALSA (Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation Schemes) Scheme, 2015. Appropriate legal proceedings include private complaint, complaint before Lokayukt and to file petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as Public Interest Litigation; (ii) As per the Full Judgment