Judgments
MONTECARLO LIMITED & ANR VERSUS NATIONAL HIGH SPEED RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED
SHRI CHAND VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
TABREZ AHMED VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS SURAJ PRAKASH & ORS
PANKAJ KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
MADHAV Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Devkaran Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - (A) Conviction only on the basis of dying declaration recorded under Section 32 of Evidence Act – Before convicting only on the basis of dying declaration, the Court must act with prudence and due caution and care and in case doubt arises, then it is an obligation to closely scrutinise all the relevant attendant circumstances. Judgments relied upon :– (1) Khushal Rao Vs. State of Bombay [AIR 1958 SC 22]. (2) Panchdeo Singh Vs. State of Bihar [AIR 2002 Full Judgment
CHANDU VENKATESWARLU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR
FAROOQ DANDOO VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
PROF. SABIHA HUSSAIN VERSUS JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA AND ORS
SH ARMAN SINDHU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SHABIR DANDOO VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER
SHIVANI MITTAL VERSUS INDU GUPTA
VALO AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD. VERSUS SPRINT CARS PVT. LTD. & ORS.
Abhishek Pandey @ Ramji Pandey and others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Law laid down - FIR lodged under Section 498-A of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act after coming to know that husband is going to marry another lady, alleging incidents occurred almost two years prior to the date of lodging the FIR and after filing suit for seeking decree of divorce under Section 13-A of Hindu Marriage Act. The FIR is nothing but an afterthought and counter-blast to the suit filed by the husband for seeking decree of divorce. Full Judgment