Judgments
Amar Singh and three others Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Chironjilal Kushwah Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down:- 1. Clause 16 of M.P. Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2015 does not contemplate opportunity of hearing before registration of F.I.R. to the police. It contemplates opportunity of hearing before proceeding for suspension or revocation of shop allotment and not for registration of F.I.R. 2. Section 2 (i a) of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 refers definition of Collector which includes Additional Collector and such other officers not below the rank of Sub-Divisional Officer and since in exercise of Full Judgment
M/S. AUTO MOVERS VERSUS LUMINOUS POWER TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
GIESECKE AND DEVRIENT MS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD RANGE 10 & ANR
METRO HERITAGE PVT. LTD. VERSUS STERLING HOLIDAY RESORTS LTD.
MS PVR LIMITED VERSUS MS TIRUPATI BUILDINGS AND OFFICES PRIVATE LIMITED
M/S NO.1 WORLD WIDE EXPRESS PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
R C S PANWAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
RAJESH KUMAR TOMAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
UTTAR PRADESH STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
VISIONS APROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MS PAYAL KAPOOR VERSUS MEGA MALL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION & ANR
HIMALAYA VINTRADE PVT. LTD. VERSUS MD. ZAHID & ANR.
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR VERSUS AKASHDEEP MORYA & ANR.
M/s.Shanti Construction Vs. M/s.Aavantika Gas Ltd & Ors.
Law laid down - 1. Constitution of India – Article 12 – Whether Avantika Gas Ltd (AGL) is an instrumentality/authority and amenable to writ jurisdiction of High Court. As per averments of reply of AGL - it is a public company limited - a joint venture of two PSUs namely GAIL and HPCL - government does not hold share in AGL “directly” - government has no pervasive/deep control in the “day to day affairs” of AGLgovernment has no direct share holding Full Judgment