Judgments
PADAM NABH & SONS Versus YASH PAL
Vinod Kumar Bhagat and Ors Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir and Ors
Anjum Pravin aka Anjum Bibi aka Anjum Khan Vs. The Bihar State Legal Services Authority
Prema Devi Vs. The Bihar State Legal Services Authority through its Secretary
Kurvan Ansari alias Kurvan Ali & Anr. versus Shyam Kishore Murmu & Anr.
THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER VERSUS M.J. JAMES
Vimla Devi versus Chhabiram & Ors.
Raju Yadav & Ors. versus Sarju Dusadh & Ors.
Shikha Jain versus The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Mohd. Mustafa Versus Union of India & Ors.
Citizens for Green Doon Versus Union of India and Others
Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and others
Mrs. Prachi Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order directing cancellation of the bail, already granted. 2. The concept of setting aside the unjustified, illegal or perverse order is totally different from the concept of cancelling the bail on the ground that accused has misconducted himself or because of some new facts requiring such cancellation. 3. Applicant should first move the Court concerned for cancellation of bail bringing out the circumstances as have been mentioned in Annexure Full Judgment
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Versus SHALIMAR ESTATES PVT. LTD. & ORS.
Ved Prakash Sharma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & ors
Law laid down - Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accordance with the guidelines engrafted in such power namely; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. In those cases power to quash the criminal proceedings or complaint or F.I.R may be exercised where the offender and victim have settled their dispute would depend on the facts and circumstances of Full Judgment