Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Civil Writ, 15783
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 17, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6902
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8223
of 2009, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Review Petition (Civil), --
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Review Petition (Civil), --
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Review Petition (Crl.), 395
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6905
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6497-6498
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 7861
of 2020, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 2708
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Law laid down -
1. Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order directing cancellation of the bail, already granted.
2. The concept of setting aside the unjustified, illegal or perverse order is totally different from the concept of cancelling the bail on the ground that accused has misconducted himself or because of some new facts requiring such cancellation.
3. Applicant should first move the Court concerned for cancellation of bail bringing out the circumstances as have been mentioned in Annexure Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Review Petition (Crl.), --
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6901
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 44785
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 16, 2021
Law laid down -
Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accordance with the guidelines engrafted in such power namely; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. In those cases power to quash the criminal proceedings or complaint or F.I.R may be exercised where the offender and victim have settled their dispute would depend on the facts and circumstances of Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5132
of 2019, Judgment Date: Nov 15, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6875
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 15, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Single Judge)
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 132844
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 15, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Single Judge)
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 138381
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 15, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6477
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 13, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6649-6650
of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 13, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2826-2827
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 13, 2021
Full Judgment
