Judgments
Narender Singh Versus The State of Haryana & Ors.
ATLANTA LIMITED THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
BANK OF BARODA & ANR. VERSUS MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED & ORS.
Sanjay Kumar Vs. Jitendra
Law Laid Down - Defence of defendant is not to be considered while deciding application under Section 13(6) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961. Only pleadings in plaint is to be considered by the Court. Court is only required to see that suit has been instituted on grounds mentioned in Section 12(1) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 and whether defendant has complied with condition enumerated in Section 13(1) of the Act of 1961 or not. On failure of defendant to Full Judgment
M/S Pm Projects And Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Micro And Small Enterprised Facilitation Council
DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LTD. Versus ANTRIX CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.
SEETHAKATHI TRUST MADRAS Versus KRISHNAVENI
Anju Devi Vs. The State of Bihar
Govind Sharma Vs. Hight Court Of Madhya Pradesh
Smt. Geetarani Tiwari Vs. Yogesh Tiwari
Dr. Vijendra Dhanware & Another Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - Admission Rules – Definition of ‘in-service candidates’ also includes the Medical Officers working in District Hospital whether or not such Hospital is situated in difficult, remote or rural area. Thus, they are entitled to be considered as special entry under 30%. MCI Regulations – Regulation 9(8). This regulation is applicable to Diploma Course and not to Degree or Post Graduate Degree Course. No provision was brought to the notice of the Court to show that posting at remote, Full Judgment
J.B.S. Chandel Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - The object of giving protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-- To take sanction for initiating prosecution against public servant for protecting them from needless harassment so as to render protective assurance to honest officer to perform public duty honestly and to best of their abilities because threat of prosecution demoralises the honest officer. Real test to determine applicability of Section 197 of Cr.C.P. and obtaining sanction from the Government are:- (i) That the accused must be a Full Judgment
LAWYERS VOICE VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS
VASUDHA SETHI & ORS. v. KIRAN V. BHASKAR & ANR.
Phoenix ARC Private Limited Versus Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir & Ors.
State of M.P. and others Vs. Ku. Preeti Patidar and others
Law laid down - S.89 and 92 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993: An amount cannot be directly recovered under Section 92 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam unless the same is determined under Section 89 of the same. This is for the reason that without determining the amount, if the notice under Section 92 is served on a person, the amount cannot be said to be due on the date of its recovery because Full Judgment
Saurabh & another Versus State of M.P. & Ors
Law laid down - M.P.Public Trusts Act, 1951. 1. The question which is posed in the present petition is that whether the Registrar Public Trust can pass an order of such a nature removing two trustees and directing the trust to conduct the election by appointing two new trustees. (Para-9). 2. A perusal of the provisions i.e. S.22,25 & 26 of the Act, it clearly reveal that if the vacancies have occurred in the Board, it can be filled through the procedure as Full Judgment
Pragnesh Shah Versus Dr Arun Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Ms Sarita Singh Versus M/s Shree Infosoft Private Limited
M/s. Rajpal Construction Co. Vs. The State of M.P. and Ors.
Law laid down - Held:- 1. The jurisdiction of the High Court under section 19 of the Act of 1983 is limited to the grounds mentioned in Section 19(2) of the Act of 1983. 2. In absence of production of the works contract before the Tribunal, it cannot be decided whether, the parties had obligation to approach the final authority under the works contract. Full Judgment