Judgments
Rushikesh Bharat Garud Versus The State of Maharashtra and others
The State of M. P. vs. Sanjay
Law laid down - Where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then Section 167 (2) (a) (ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of “default bail” after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed. In view of the same, since the maximum sentence provided u/s.467 of IPC is life imprisonment, regardless that the minimum sentence is less then 10 years, the period of filing Full Judgment
Ashok Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh Yadav Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
SOMAN v. INLAND WATERWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR.
Community Action Through Motivation Program (CAMP) Versus State of M.P. and others
PRADEEP S/O RAJKUMAR JAIN VERSUS MANGANESE ORE(INDIA) LIMITED & ORS.
Gulab Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
M/S SUVARNA COOPERATIVE BANK LTD Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.
BHAGCHANDRA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE VERSUS M/S CITI BANK N.A.
JACOB PUNNEN & ANR. VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
THE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI VERSUS UTTAMCHAND BOHRA
Hirdayshay Vs. Nutanbai
Law laid down - Held : 1. The husband and wife lived together only for about two years intermittently, since February, 1988 and thereafter, the husband had to either serve the notice or to take the recourse of issuance of search warrant through S.D.M. Despite making persistent efforts to persuade wife to return, she did not join the company of husband and she filed two cases against the husband, both resulted in dismissal. Thus, the intention of wife is clear i.e to Full Judgment
SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH VERSUS JAISHRI @ JAISHREE @ SMT.JAISHRI
PUSHPA RAI @ PUSHPA KUMARI Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS
Anil Kumar Kanojia Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1.Evidence of a witness examined in other trial can be relied and used only when exigencies provided under Section 299 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are fulfilled i.e. if it is proved that witness had absconded or died or there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience which, under the circumstances of the case, would be unreasonable. 2.If the eventualities mentioned in Section 299(1) of the Code of Criminal Full Judgment