Judgments
Pankaj Mahajan Vs. Dimple @ Kajal
Inderjit Singh Grewal Versus State of Punjab & Anr.
Vinny Parmvir Parmar VS. Parmvir Parmar
STATE OF KERALA & ANR.Vs C.P. RAO
when there was no corroboration of testimony of the complainant regarding the demand of bribe by the accused, it has to be accepted that the version of the complainant is not corroborated and, therefore, the evidence of the complainant cannot be relied on. mere recovery of tainted money, divorced from the circumstances under which it is paid, is not sufficient to convict the accused when the substantive evidence in the case is not reliable. The mere recovery by itself cannot prove Full Judgment
H. Siddiqui (dead) by Lrs. Vs. A. Ramalingam
Budhadev Karmaskar versus State of West Bengal
RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA VERSUS PRAKASH CHANDRA MISHRA & ORS.
D.N. JEEVARAJU & ANR. VERSUS D. SUDHAKAR & ORS. ETC.
Sanjay Kumar Jain Versus State of Delhi
CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION versus UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
PARAMJIT SINGH VERSUS DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS & ORS.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai versus Tulsyan NEC Ltd.
Centre for Environment & Food Security Versus Union of India & Ors.
Subhash Chand Versus State of Haryana & Ors.
Abrar Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Hari Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Subhash Vs. State of Haryana
SHER SINGH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA
C.M. SHARMA Vs STATE OF A.P.
“26. Therefore, the very foundation of the prosecution case is shaken to a great extent. The question as to the handing over of any bribe and recovery of the same from the accused should be considered along with other material circumstances one of which is the question whether any demand was at all made by the appellant for the bribe. When it is found that no such demand was made by the accused and the prosecution has given a false story Full Judgment