Judgments
Vishwanath Sahu and others Vs State of Chhattisgarh
Even strong suspicion founded on the material on record, to form a presumptive opinion constituting the offence alleged, would justify framing of charge Full Judgment
Mithun Gendre Vs State of Chhattisgarh And Santosh Kumar & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh
Witnesses called by prosecution could be contradicted by defence or with the permission of court by prosecution by reference to their statements made to police under Section 161 of the CrPC. Witnesses called by defence or court could not be contradicted by reference to their statements recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC. Full Judgment
Kumar Sai Vs State of Chhattisgarh
Rape- If the evidence of the prosecutrix inspires full confidence - Conviction can be held justified Full Judgment
P.L.Tatwal Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
The competent authority to give previous sanction is the authority competent to remove one from service. No doubt the appointing authority is the authority competent to remove him from service. The Statute is very clear that the authority competent to remove an officer from service is the authority to give sanction for prosecution. Full Judgment
Omprakash Vs State of Chhattisgarh
IPC Section 302 & 304 – All cases of single blow cannot be classified u/S 304 IPC – Each case has to be judged on its own facts and circumstances. Full Judgment
Trinath & another Vs State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh)
Arun Rampal Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh (Now The State of Chhattisgarh) And Ram Singh & Anr. Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh (Now The State of Chhattisgarh)
Right of Private Defence of Person – Principles Discussed. Full Judgment
Ruswa alias Hari Singh & Another Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh (now State of Chhattisgarh)
State through CBI New Delhi Vs Jitender Kumar Singh
The Special Judge appointed under Section 3(1) could exercise the powers under sub-section (3) to Section 4 to try non-PC offence. Therefore, trying a case by a Special Judge under Section 3(1) is a sine-qua-non for exercising jurisdiction by the Special Judge for trying any offence, other than an offence specified in Section 3. “Trying any case” under Section 3(1) is, therefore, a jurisdictional fact for the Special Judge Full Judgment