Judgments
Ram Khelawan Vs State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Nitin Sinha Vs Union of India Through: its Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi & Ors.
People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) & Another. Vs The Union of India & Another.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jabalpur Vs M/s Itarsi Oil and Flour Mills, Raipur
Harishankar Prasad Sahu and two others Vs State of Chhattisgarh
Sarveshwar Kumar Kaushik & Another Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh (now State of Chhattisgarh)
B. JAYARAJ Vs STATE OF A.P.
7. In so far as the offence under Section 7 is concerned, it is a settled position in law that demand of illegal gratification is sine qua non to constitute the said offence and mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute the offence under Section 7 unless it is proved beyond all reasonable doubt that the accused voluntarily accepted the money knowing it to be a bribe. Mere possession and recovery of the currency notes from the accused without proof of demand Full Judgment
SMT. LEELABAI WD/O DAGDUBA HINGNE AND 3 ORS Vs SAU. BHIKABAI SHRIRAM PAKHARE
SMT. LEELABAI WD/O DAGDUBA HINGNE AND 3 ORS Vs SAU. BHIKABAI SHRIRAM PAKHARE Full Judgment
Narinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr
Omprakash Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Atma Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh
Jagan Ram Vs The State of MP (Now C.G.)
Death caused while defending body and property does not amount to murder. Full Judgment
Sanjay Bharti Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others.
A probationer has no right to hold the post and his service can be terminated at any time during or at the end of the period of probation on account of general unsuitability for the post held by him. If the competent authority holds an inquiry for judging the suitability of the probationer or for his further continuance in service or for confirmation and such inquiry is the basis for taking decision to terminate his service, then the action of Full Judgment
Shruti Deshpande Vs Shriram Deshpande And Shriram Deshpande Vs Shruti Deshpande
Rajendra @ Matauva & Ors Vs State of Chhattisgarh And Rakesh & Anr Vs The State of Chhattisgarh
Dying declaration is also a kind of evidence. Courts are required to scrutinize the dying declaration on the basis of other surrounding and attending circumstances minutely. Part of dying declaration corroborated by other attending circumstances can be relied upon and part of dying declaration not corroborated by attending circumstances is not safe to rely. Full Judgment