VISHNU BABU TAMBE Vs. APURVA VISHNU TAMBE
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11578-79 of 2016, Judgment Date: Dec 02, 2016
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11578-79 OF 2016
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 15440-15441 OF 2016 ]
VISHNU BABU TAMBE Appellant(s)
VERSUS
APURVA VISHNU TAMBE Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant is aggrieved by the interim order dated 23.03.2016 in
Civil Application No. 355 of 2013 with Civil Application No. 106 of 2015 in
Family Court Appeal No. 241 of 2013.
3. It is not in dispute that the appeal, as such, is pending before the
High Court. The appeal is filed by the respondent herein against the
Judgment and decree dated 30.09.2013 passed by the Family Court, Bandra,
Mumbai, dissolving the marriage between the appellant and the respondent.
4. While hearing the interlocutory applications, the High Court took
note of the submission made by the appellant that the Court should take
note of the subsequent marriage performed by the appellant after the decree
of dissolution of marriage and pass appropriate orders. While considering
the applications at the interlocutory stage, the High Court has granted a
declaration that the second marriage performed by the appellant on
02.01.2014 is completely illegal.
5. Having heard the learned counsel on both the sides, we are of the
view that the High Court should have refrained from passing a final order
on the issue at the interlocutory stage. All available contentions are to
be raised by the parties at the stage of final disposal of the appeal.
6. Therefore, we dispose of these appeals with a request to the High
Court to dispose of the Family Court Appeal No. 241 of 2013 expeditiously,
without being influenced by any of the observations and findings recorded
by the High Court in the impugned order as also by this Court, since those
observations and findings are only to be taken as a prima facie view of the
Court, for an order passed at an interlocutory stage.
7. In that view of the matter, the declaration regarding illegality of
the second marriage is vacated.
8. We make it clear that all available contentions are left open to the
parties, to be raised at the time of final disposal of the appeal before
the High Court.
No costs.
.......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J.
[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]
New Delhi;
December 02, 2016.