VIJAY KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 5 of 2016, Judgment Date: May 11, 2016
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
I.A. NO. 5 OF 2016
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2853 OF 2009
VIJAY KUMAR APPLICANT/APPELLANT
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN,J.
1. The learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that
the possession having been taken, the mere non-payment of compensation will
not result in lapse under Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation
and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,
2013.
2. Though the submission made by the learned senior counsel for
respondent on possession is in dispute, in the nature of the view we
propose in this case, it is not necessary to go into that aspect. It is
seen that out of the three co-owners, in respect of two co-owners, the
Court has declared that the acquisition proceedings have lapsed. In that
view of the matter, we allow this application, leaving the question of law
open.
3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.5/2006, C.A. No.2853/2009 is also
allowed. It is declared that the land acquisition proceedings, in respect
of the land admeasuring 13 Bigha, 14 Biswas bearing Khasra Nos.10/30 and
5/25/2/1, Village Sahipur, Delhi initiated as per Notification dated
13.11.1959 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 culminating in
Award dated 24.06.1968, have lapsed and consequently those proceedings are
set aside.
4. Appeal is allowed. No costs.
................J.
[KURIAN JOSEPH]
....................J.
[ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN]
NEW DELHI;
MAY 11, 2016