Siddhu Vs. The State Of U.P
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4801 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 17
Case :- BAIL No. - 4801 of 2015
Applicant :- Siddhu
Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Bajpai
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Raghvendra Kumar,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been submitted on behalf of the accused applicant that the criminal cases which were pending against the accused applicant have resulted into acquittal after conclusion of trial, thus remain pending the isolated case in hand.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail of the accused applicant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of the counsels for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let the accused-applicant-Siddhu, involved in Case Crime No.171 of 2015, u/s 2/3 U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S.-Motipur, District-Bahraich be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy and reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned on the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking that he shall co-operate in the expeditious disposal of the case.
(ii) The applicant shall also file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of IPC.
(iv) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under section 174-A of IPC.
(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 15.6.2015